Tag Archives: Plaintiff’s

Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Circuit Judge, 20th Judicial Circuit Court of Houston County, (Civil Division, Dothan) Alabama, invited to ALTER or AMEND his NOVEL LEGAL THEORY Judgment, Monday, March 27, 2017 (3/27/2017) 9:50:07 AM (38-CV-2015-900261.00)


_________________________________________________
Unified Judicial System

State of Alabama

AlaFile E-Notice

38-CV-2015-900261.00

To: Jerry Michael Blevins
ATTYJMBlev@LawOfficeOfJerryMBlevins.com

Judge: Henry D. “Butch” Binford

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Brian Ralph Beasley

38-CV-2015-900261.00

The following matter was Filed on 3/27/2017 9:50:07 AM

C001

Motion to Vacate or Modify

[Filer: Blevins Jerry Michael]

Notice Date: 3/27/2017 9:50:07 AM

Carla H. Woodall
Circuit Court Clerk
Houston County, Alabama
P.O. Drawer 6406
Dothan, AL 36302
334-677-4859
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 51

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Beasley Brian Ralph
Defendant

Civil Action No.: CV-2015-900261

MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves the Court to alter or amend the judgment previously rendered in this cause, and in support thereof says as follows:

Relevant Procedural History

1. On May 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this cause seeking damages stemming from an assault and battery committed on his person by Defendant on or about February 9, 2015

2. On July 2, 2015, Defendant filed his answer

3. On February 21, 2017, a bench trial occurred at which Defendant failed to attend in-person or through counsel

The only testimony presented at trial was Plaintiff’s, which was uncontroverted by other admissible evidence

4. On February 23, 2017, the Court rendered a final judgment in favor of Defendant

Discussion

5. Plaintiff contends that pursuant to Rule 55, Ala.R.Civ.P., because Defendant failed to appear at trial in-person or through counsel, he was entitled to a default judgment against Defendant on the assault and battery claim

See Seventh Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.,

364 So.2d 1173 (Ala. 1978)

(A party who fails to appear on the day the case is set for trial is in default);

and

Cassioppi v. Damico,

536 So.2d 938 (Ala. 1988)

(A judgment entered after one party fails to appear at trial is treated as a default judgment)

6. Plaintiff further contends that because his trial testimony was uncontroverted by other

1
_________________________________________________
admissible evidence, he was entitled to an award of damages stemming from the assault and battery

7. Plaintiff contends the Court erred in not granting him a judgment, and in not awarding appropriate damages, on the assault and battery claim

WHEREFORE Plaintiff requests that the Court alter or amend the judgment previously entered in this cause, and grant him a default judgment against Defendant, and award him damages in the sum of $30,000.00, on the assault and battery claim, for the reasons set forth herein

Jerry M. Blevins
(BLE003)
Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:
Law Office of Jerry M. Blevins
Carr, Riggs and Ingram Building
7550 Halcyon Summit Drive, Suite 100
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
(334) 262-7600 (Voice)
(334) 262-7644 (Fax)
E-Mail: ATTYJMBlev@LawOfficeOfJerryMBlevins.com

2

Filing
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 51

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing upon:

Mr. Brian Ralph Beasley
368 Hanchey Field Road
Daleville, Alabama 36322

via electronic transmission and / or by depositing a copy of the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid this 27th day of March, 2017

Jerry M. Blevins
_________________________________________________
Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP) VII. JUDGMENT Rule 55.
………………………………………………..
(a) Entry
(b) Judgment
(1) By the Clerk

Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption

The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of judgment by default when the default arises from failure to appear on the day the case is set for trial

Rule 55(a) authorizes the clerk to enter defaults upon the civil docket when the party fails to plead or otherwise defend
——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Seventh Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.
364 So. 2d 1173
(Ala. 1978)
77-602
………………………………………………..
Alabama Supreme Court

December 1, 1978
——————————————————————
http://www.ecases.us/case/ala/c1102643/wonder-v-southbound-records-inc
——————————————————————
(A party who fails to appear on the day the case is set for trial is in default)
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1102643/wonder-v-southbound-records-inc/
——————————————————————
http://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1978/364-so-2d-1173-1.html
_________________________________________________
Cassioppi v. Damico
536 So. 2d 938
(Ala. 1988)
87-965
………………………………………………..
Alabama Supreme Court

November 18, 1988
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1932665/cassioppi-v-damico/
——————————————————————
(A judgment entered after one party fails to appear at trial is treated as a default judgment)
——————————————————————
https://casetext.com/case/cassioppi-v-damico
_________________________________________________
Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Houston County Circuit Court, 20th Judicial Circuit Judge, Dothan, Alabama (since February 12 2008) Huntingdon College (@HuntingdonColl) University of Alabama School of Law (@UALawSchool) former Veteran Prosecutor, in the Assault and Battery Civil case: Plaintiff v. Brian Ralph Beasley, Defendant (of Daleville, Dale County, Alabama) WHO FAILED TO APPEAR on the DAY the CASE (38-CV-2015-900261.00) WAS SET FOR TRIAL (February 21 2017) on February 23, 2017, espoused a NEW LEGAL THEORY when he ENTERED JUDGMENT for the DEFENDANT CONTRARY to Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP) VII. JUDGMENT Rule 55: The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT when the DEFAULT arises from FAILURE TO APPEAR on the day the case is set for trial
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-1rB
_________________________________________________

Advertisements

Police State ARIZONA (U.S.A.)

Police State Arizona (U.S.A.)
======================================
ARIZONA
_______________________________________________
FREEDOM of RELIGION – FIRST AMENDMENT

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …
………………………………………………..
LESSON: Don’t have private Religious activities on your property, because it’s not really your property; if it was actually your property you would be able to do what you want to on it, it’s the property of the Authoritarian Totalitarian Fascist wannabes who want to wield POWER over the slaves (“taxpayers“) of the ARIZONA POLICE STATE, and they can’t control you unless you meet at a POLICE STATE approved location and have obtained a FEDERAL POLICE STATE number; because separation of Church and State is paramount, and how else are they going to be able to find out if Electioneering is going on if it’s a private religious meeting❓

Sarcasm … Deal with it

It’s okay to have friends over for a private reading of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, in POLICE STATE Phoenix ARIZONA (U.S.A.), just not the Bible

After all, POLICE STATE Phoenix ARIZONA (U.S.A.) is more concerned with private religious get-togethers than it is concerned about United States Federal Government military veterans receiving the care they deserve and haven’t received from President Barack H. Obama, and Senator John McCain and the Do Nothing Congress
_______________________________________________
Phoenix, Arizona Wins Religious Land Use Suit | RLUIPA Defense
Jul 30, 2015
Zoning, and the Courts
Home Land Use Regulation
Phoenix, Arizona Wins Religious Land Use Suit
——————————————————————
https://www.rluipa-defense.com/2015/07/phoenix-arizona-wins-religious-land-use-suit/
_______________________________________________
[PDF] NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF – U.S. Courts
US Courts (.gov) › ca9 › cdn › 2015/01/02
Jan 2, 2015
MICHAEL SALMAN and SUZANNE. SALMANs,. Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX
——————————————————————
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2015/01/02/12-16497.pdf
_______________________________________________
MICHAEL SALMAN V. CITY OF PHOENIX, No. 12-16497 (9th Cir
law.justia.com › 12-16497-2015-01-02
Jan 2, 2015
No. 12-16497 (9th Cir. 2015) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
——————————————————————
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/12-16497/12-16497-2015-01-02.html
_______________________________________________
Michael Salman v. City of Phoenix, – CourtListener.com
https://www.courtlistener.com › opinion
Mobile-friendly
Jan 2, 2015
Opinion for Michael Salman v. City of Phoenix,
Salman v. City of Phoenix,
12-16497 (9th Cir. 2015)
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2766406/michael-salman-v-city-of-phoenix/
_______________________________________________
Michael Salman – The Rutherford Institute
Newsroom · Constitutional Corner · · » Issues » Overcriminalization
………………………………………………..
The Rutherford Institute :: The Overcriminalization of America:
Aug 6, 2012
What happened to Michael Salman—armed police raids of his property, repeated warnings against
Of course, these zoning officials had no problem with group gatherings for family
——————————————————————
http://rutherford.org/issues/overcriminalization/michael_salman
________________________________________________
The Rutherford Institute :: Rutherford Institute Warns Sheriff Arpaio
https://www.rutherford.org › rutherford_institute
Jul 24, 2012
Rutherford Institute
Warns Sheriff Arpaio, Tents Jail Officials Against Interfering with
Michael Salman’s
——————————————————————
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/rutherford_institute_warns_sheriff_arpaio_tents_jail_officials_against_inte
________________________________________________
Michael Salman’s “Last Hope” for Getting Out of Jail Denied
Phoenix New Times
Jul 23, 2012
See also: Michael Salman wants to build a church in his backyard See also:
Michael Salman Is Not in
——————————————————————
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/michael-salmans-last-hope-for-getting-out-of-jail-denied-by-arizona-supreme-court-6629711
_______________________________________________
Next: Arizona Supreme Court denies writ of habeas corpus in case
http://www.examiner.com
Jul 23, 2012
Supreme Court
in Arizona denies writ of habeas corpus
in case of jailed pastor
In the ongoing case of Michael Salman, a pastor jailed
San Diego Christianity & Culture Examiner
——————————————————————
http://www.examiner.com/article/arizona-supreme-court-denies-writ-of-habeas-corpus-case-of-jailed-pastor
_______________________________________________
[PDF] writ of habeas corpus – The Rutherford Institute
Jul 17, 2012
Bible studies (not open to the general public) and religious worship at their residence in Phoenix
——————————————————————
https://www.rutherford.org/files_images/general/07-17-2012_Salman_Memorandum.pdf
_______________________________________________
The Rutherford Institute :: Rutherford Institute Petitions for Writ
@Rutherford_institute
Jul 17, 2012
On The Front Lines —Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute have petitioned the Arizona Supreme Court
habeas corpus from the Arizona Supreme Court
http://www.rutherford.org
——————————————————————
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/rutherford_institute_petitions_for_writ_of_habeas_corpus_asking_arizona_sup
_______________________________________________
Wilenchik & Bartness Files Petition for Habeas Corpus in Pastor
http://www.wb-law.com
Jul 17, 2012
Wilenchik & Bartness Files Petition for Habeas Corpus in Pastor Michael Salman Case
News Articles
Email: contactwb @wb-law.com
——————————————————————
http://www.wb-law.com/news/wilenchik-bartness-files-petition-for-habeas-corpus-pastor-michael-salman-case/
_______________________________________________
Bible studies on one’s property
………………………………………………..
Michael Salman, Phoenix Pastor, Jailed For Holding Church Services Without Proper Permits
………………………………………………..
Huffington Post
@HuffingtonPost
Timothy Stenovec
@TimSteno
7/16/2012 July 16, 2012
——————————————————————
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/16/michael-salman-phoenix-pastor-jailed-bible-study-video_n_1677943.html
_______________________________________________
Michael Salman, Phoenix Pastor, Jailed – Huffington Post
Jul 16, 2012
And he told us with all the evidence that it was a church
For their part, and despite the guilty verdict
——————————————————————
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1677943
_______________________________________________
Phoenix Officials Release ‘Fact Sheet’ in Jailed Pastor’s Home
12 jul. 2012
The City of Phoenix on July 12 released a fact sheet and timeline
Michael Salman, an ordained pastor of Church of God
Atheist Group Appeals
Decision Allowing 40-Foot Cross
——————————————————————
http://m.christianpost.com/news/city-of-phoenix-release-fact-sheet-in-michael-salman-jail-pastor-home-bible-study-case-78153/
======================================
_______________________________________________
12-16497 Michael Salman v. City of Phoenix – YouTube
YouTube › watch › v=WoXssRDdDSo
Duration : 35:19
Posted : 10 oct. 2014
——————————————————————

_______________________________________________

Steven Grodnitzky, Acting Manager, EO Technical Unit directed the preparation of a Sensitive Case Report regarding the “Tea Party cases”

Steven Grodnitzky
Steven Grodnitzky, Acting Manager, EO Technical Unit directed the preparation of a Sensitive Case Report regarding the “Tea Party cases”
70.
Steven Grodnitzky
Acting Manager
EO Technical Unit
102. April 2010
99.
102. April 2010 – July 2010
105. July 2010
113.
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-yG
________________________________________________
IRS AND TIGTA MANAGEMENT FAILURES RELATED TO 501(c)(4)
http://www.hsgac.senate.gov
Sep 5, 2014
D. Handling Other Tea Party Cases in Cincinnati: February to
alerted the EO Technical Unit to the potentially high profile
264 5/17/11 Sensitive Case Report, prepared by Carter
——————————————————————
http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/report_-irs-and-tigta-mgmt-failures-related-to-501c4-sept-5-2014
________________________________________________
Report – Committee on Oversight and Government Reform – U.S.
https://oversight.house.gov
4A: IRS
June 17, 2011
65
Sensitive Case Report
Tea Party cases
The September 2012 sensitive case report
Tax Law Specialist in
June 14, 2013
Q. Okay. Now, sir, in this
EO Technical Unit
——————————————————————
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/4-10-14-CONTEMPT-REPORT-Full-Committee-Business-Meeting-Lois-Lerner1.pdf
________________________________________________
[PDF] H.Res. – Congress.gov
› crpt › hrpt415
https://www.congress.gov
Apr 14, 2014
Tax Law Specialist in
Fig.4A: IRS for EO Technical Unit
Sensitive Case Report
Tea Party cases
——————————————————————
https://www.congress.gov/113/crpt/hrpt415/CRPT-113hrpt415.pdf
________________________________________________
lois lerner’s involvement in the irs targeting of tax-exempt
https://oversight.house.gov
Mar 11, 2014
Technical Unit to subject to a “multi-tier review” system. 11
Tea Party cases
for these cases? Thanks in advance Sensitive Case Report
Tax Law Specialist in EO Technical Unit
——————————————————————
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Lerner-Report1.pdf
________________________________________________
lawsuit – American Center for Law and Justice
media.aclj.org
Jun 25, 2013
Acting Director of the Office
EO Technical Unit
(Defendant Grodnitzky) directed the preparation of a Sensitive Case Report regarding the “Tea Party cases”
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
________________________________________________
Untitled – Bloomberg BNA
Bureau of National Affairs
der.nsf
requests for guidance or assistance from the EO Technical Unit so that
Related Recommendation: Revise the process or develop a more
Sensitive Case Report
the during the period in 2010 when no determinations
Tea Party cases
——————————————————————
https://www.bna.com/uploadedFiles/hlrc_ug.pdf
________________________________________________
Plaintiff’s First Amended Verified Complaint for Declaratory
Feb 8, 2012
Acting Manager of the , was aware of the existence and application of the IRS. Targeting Scheme
EO Technical Unit
need for a on the Sensitive Case Report
Tea Party cases
——————————————————————
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/ComplaintTTVvIRS.pdf

http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/TTV.v.IRS.php
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================