Tag Archives: Law Office of Jerry M. Blevins

Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Circuit Judge, 20th Judicial Circuit Court of Houston County, (Civil Division, Dothan) Alabama, invited to ALTER or AMEND his NOVEL LEGAL THEORY Judgment, Monday, March 27, 2017 (3/27/2017) 9:50:07 AM (38-CV-2015-900261.00)


_________________________________________________
Unified Judicial System

State of Alabama

AlaFile E-Notice

38-CV-2015-900261.00

To: Jerry Michael Blevins
ATTYJMBlev@LawOfficeOfJerryMBlevins.com

Judge: Henry D. “Butch” Binford

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Brian Ralph Beasley

38-CV-2015-900261.00

The following matter was Filed on 3/27/2017 9:50:07 AM

C001

Motion to Vacate or Modify

[Filer: Blevins Jerry Michael]

Notice Date: 3/27/2017 9:50:07 AM

Carla H. Woodall
Circuit Court Clerk
Houston County, Alabama
P.O. Drawer 6406
Dothan, AL 36302
334-677-4859
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 51

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Beasley Brian Ralph
Defendant

Civil Action No.: CV-2015-900261

MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves the Court to alter or amend the judgment previously rendered in this cause, and in support thereof says as follows:

Relevant Procedural History

1. On May 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this cause seeking damages stemming from an assault and battery committed on his person by Defendant on or about February 9, 2015

2. On July 2, 2015, Defendant filed his answer

3. On February 21, 2017, a bench trial occurred at which Defendant failed to attend in-person or through counsel

The only testimony presented at trial was Plaintiff’s, which was uncontroverted by other admissible evidence

4. On February 23, 2017, the Court rendered a final judgment in favor of Defendant

Discussion

5. Plaintiff contends that pursuant to Rule 55, Ala.R.Civ.P., because Defendant failed to appear at trial in-person or through counsel, he was entitled to a default judgment against Defendant on the assault and battery claim

See Seventh Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.,

364 So.2d 1173 (Ala. 1978)

(A party who fails to appear on the day the case is set for trial is in default);

and

Cassioppi v. Damico,

536 So.2d 938 (Ala. 1988)

(A judgment entered after one party fails to appear at trial is treated as a default judgment)

6. Plaintiff further contends that because his trial testimony was uncontroverted by other

1
_________________________________________________
admissible evidence, he was entitled to an award of damages stemming from the assault and battery

7. Plaintiff contends the Court erred in not granting him a judgment, and in not awarding appropriate damages, on the assault and battery claim

WHEREFORE Plaintiff requests that the Court alter or amend the judgment previously entered in this cause, and grant him a default judgment against Defendant, and award him damages in the sum of $30,000.00, on the assault and battery claim, for the reasons set forth herein

Jerry M. Blevins
(BLE003)
Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:
Law Office of Jerry M. Blevins
Carr, Riggs and Ingram Building
7550 Halcyon Summit Drive, Suite 100
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
(334) 262-7600 (Voice)
(334) 262-7644 (Fax)
E-Mail: ATTYJMBlev@LawOfficeOfJerryMBlevins.com

2

Filing
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 51

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing upon:

Mr. Brian Ralph Beasley
368 Hanchey Field Road
Daleville, Alabama 36322

via electronic transmission and / or by depositing a copy of the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid this 27th day of March, 2017

Jerry M. Blevins
_________________________________________________
Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP) VII. JUDGMENT Rule 55.
………………………………………………..
(a) Entry
(b) Judgment
(1) By the Clerk

Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption

The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of judgment by default when the default arises from failure to appear on the day the case is set for trial

Rule 55(a) authorizes the clerk to enter defaults upon the civil docket when the party fails to plead or otherwise defend
——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Seventh Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.
364 So. 2d 1173
(Ala. 1978)
77-602
………………………………………………..
Alabama Supreme Court

December 1, 1978
——————————————————————
http://www.ecases.us/case/ala/c1102643/wonder-v-southbound-records-inc
——————————————————————
(A party who fails to appear on the day the case is set for trial is in default)
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1102643/wonder-v-southbound-records-inc/
——————————————————————
http://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1978/364-so-2d-1173-1.html
_________________________________________________
Cassioppi v. Damico
536 So. 2d 938
(Ala. 1988)
87-965
………………………………………………..
Alabama Supreme Court

November 18, 1988
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1932665/cassioppi-v-damico/
——————————————————————
(A judgment entered after one party fails to appear at trial is treated as a default judgment)
——————————————————————
https://casetext.com/case/cassioppi-v-damico
_________________________________________________
Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Houston County Circuit Court, 20th Judicial Circuit Judge, Dothan, Alabama (since February 12 2008) Huntingdon College (@HuntingdonColl) University of Alabama School of Law (@UALawSchool) former Veteran Prosecutor, in the Assault and Battery Civil case: Plaintiff v. Brian Ralph Beasley, Defendant (of Daleville, Dale County, Alabama) WHO FAILED TO APPEAR on the DAY the CASE (38-CV-2015-900261.00) WAS SET FOR TRIAL (February 21 2017) on February 23, 2017, espoused a NEW LEGAL THEORY when he ENTERED JUDGMENT for the DEFENDANT CONTRARY to Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP) VII. JUDGMENT Rule 55: The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT when the DEFAULT arises from FAILURE TO APPEAR on the day the case is set for trial
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-1rB
_________________________________________________

Advertisements

Dennis C. Latham is a Renegade Emperor King Barack Obama Lover who Hates TRUTH from specific people

President Barack Obama the liar -Barack Obama backing what I said TO BE TRUE
PROVING Obama to be a liar but Obama has too much PRIDE in his hate towards Conservatives and Trump To admit being wrong
………………………………………………..
The Renegade Emperor King has No Clothes
_________________________________________________
King Latham’s Universal Revolution – BOOO YAH !!!
………………………………………………..
If Dennis C. Latham is a “King,” he is a

“KING of FOOLS,” like OBAMA

YAH BOY !!!
_________________________________________________
Attorney Jerry Blevins of Montgomery, AL is a liar who hates TRUTH from specific people
………………………………………………..
February 6, 2015
——————————————————————
https://dennisclatham.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/attorney-jerry-blevins-of-montgomery-al-is-a-liar-who-hates-truth-from-specific-people
_________________________________________________
attorney jerry blevins the liar – Insurance Agent backing what I said TO BE TRUE
PROVING blevins to be a liar but blevins has too much PRIDE in his hate towards Obama Care and Obama To admit being wrong
_________________________________________________
Dennis C. Latham
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Dennis C. Latham
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————
https://www.dennisclatham.wordpress.com
_________________________________________________
Jonathan Gruber, obamacare architect, says Dennis C. Latham is STUPID
………………………………………………..
CNN (@CNN)
——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Barack Hussein Obama LIES

If you like your Doctor
You can Keep your Doctor

If you like your Health Plan
You can keep your Health Plan
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Barack H. Obama LIES

On my first day in office, we closed the revolving door between lobbying firms and the government so that no one in my administration would make decisions based on the interests of former or future employers
_________________________________________________
Barack Obama rails against Supreme Court “strike on democracy
………………………………………………..
Politico (@Politico)

Malachy Browne (@MalachyBrowne)

1/24/2010
——————————————————————
http://politico.ie/index.php?Itemid=878&catid=232:world&id=6190:barack-obama-rails-against-supreme-court-decision-on-electioneering&option=com_content&view=article
_________________________________________________
Barack Obama LIES

No political appointees in an Obama-Biden administration will be permitted to work on regulations or contracts directly and substantially related to their prior employer for two years

And no political appointee will be able to lobby the executive branch after leaving government service during the remainder of the administration
_________________________________________________
Tougher rules against revolving door for lobbyists and former officials
………………………………………………..
The Tampa Bay Times Politi-Fact
——————————————————————
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/240/tougher-rules-against-revolving-door-for-lobbyists/
_________________________________________________
Obama CORRUPT EPA
………………………………………………..
Energy and Environment Legal Institute Report: Improper Collusion Between Environmental Pressure Groups and the Environmental Protection Agency As Revealed by Freedom of Information Act Requests
………………………………………………..
Interim Report September 2014
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-1jQ
_________________________________________________
when rules represent

an unprecedented break from past practices, the public has a right to know whether this decision was based on policy or politics
_________________________________________________
Watchdog calls on IG to probe refiners’ influence on proposed RFS rule
………………………………………………..
E and E News

Melanie Sloan Amanda Paterka

May 22, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.governorsbiofuelscoalition.org/?p=9424
Energy and Environmental Law
………………………………………………..
http://eelegal.org/?page_id=1493
_________________________________________________
Obama EPA of CORRUPTION
………………………………………………..
Eye on the Environmental Protection Agency (@EPA): Less Than Thorough – Flaws in Recent EPA Office of Inspector General Investigations: OIG Ignores Leads on EPA’s Email Follies
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-1n3
_________________________________________________
Obama LIES

In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears
_________________________________________________
Obama Lays Out Ethics Rules
………………………………………………..
The Washington Post (@WashingtonPost)

Chris Cillizza (@TheFix)

November 11, 2008
——————————————————————
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2008/obama-lays-out-ethics-rules.html
_________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
………………………………………………..
SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Act
——————————————————————
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Freedom_of_Information_Act
_________________________________________________
Obama CORRUPTED EPA
………………………………………………..
EPA Improperly Denies FOIA Waivers for Disfavored Groups, Inspector General Again Improperly Limits Inquiry into Abuses
………………………………………………..
Christopher Horner (@Chris_C_Horner)

Chaim Mandelbaum

Cliff Smith

Brittany Mandi

July, 2014

June 27, 2014
——————————————————————
http://eelegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/EE-Legal-Report-on-EPA-Fee-Waiver-Bias-and-OIG-Abuse-6-27-14.pdf
_________________________________________________
Obama LIES that his administration will be the most Transparent
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————

_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..

——————————————————————

_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..

——————————————————————

_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..

——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Barack Obama (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama) CORRUPT Renegade Emperor King unilaterally declared that the U.S. Senate was NOT IN SESSION; when it was in fact in a “pro forma session,” so that he could make so-called recess appointments of his three (3) highly partisan nominees to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) without Senate approval (January 2012)

U.S. Constitution permits temporary “recess” appointments when the Senate is NOT IN SESSION

Senate was in a “pro forma session”

Obama defined the session as a SHAM

Noel Canning, a soft-drink distributor, sued the N.L.R.B., claiming the Obama administration exceeded its constitutional authority when it appointed three (3) NLRB members who ruled on his case

Therefore, the N L R B lacked a quorum of five (5) members because three (3) of them were appointed unconstitutionally when Obama ignored Senate rule that it was in session

NLRB kept conducting business as usual in spite of the lawsuit and in spite of a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion striking down the appointments

“the Senate is part of a co-equal branch of government that is entitled to set its own rules, and the president can’t step in and override them”

Supreme Court

Justice Stephen Bryer

In our view, however, the pro forma sessions count as sessions, not as periods of recess

We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business

The Senate met that standard here

The Democratic-controlled board of the NLRB, a federal agency that oversees private-sector union-organizing elections and referees management-employee disputes, decided 436 cases during the 18 months two (2) of the three (3) now-invalid appointees were seated, an NLRB spokesman said

The third appointee stepped down after several months on the job. The current board must decide whether to protectively redo those 416 rulings to try to shield them from new challenges, though labor lawyers said that in general, the vast majority of board decisions aren’t controversial

Many of the NLRB orders have likely already been implemented, such as workers being rehired or collective-bargaining contracts being negotiated and implemented. It would be hard to undo such things and likely not worthwhile for parties to challenge, labor lawyers said

Still, more than 100 of the 436 decisions were challenged by companies in federal court and could be sent back by the courts to the board to be re-decided—if they haven’t been otherwise resolved, labor lawyers said. . . .
_________________________________________________
Obama Cannot Set Senate Rules
………………………………………………..
American Center for Law and Justice (@ACLJ)

Jay Sekulow (@JaySekulow)
——————————————————————
http://aclj.org/us-constitution/jay-sekulow-obama-cannot-set-senate-rules
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..
American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/Noel%20Canning%20S%20%20Cr%20%20amicus%20-%20final.pdf
_________________________________________________
NLRB v. Noel Canning, Docket No. 12-1281
………………………………………………..
2014
——————————————————————
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-1281
_________________________________________________
Supreme Court Ruling Forces NLRB to Scramble to Revisit Cases
………………………………………………..
Wall Street Journal (@WSJ)

Melanie Trottman (@MelanieTrottman)

June 26, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-ruling-forces-nlrb-to-scramble-to-redecide-cases-1403818711
_________________________________________________