Tag Archives: District

Dennis K. Burke, CORRUPT United States Attorney for the District of Arizona appointed by Barack Obama (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama), resigns August 29, 2011, after admitting he released a Fast and Furious memorandum to a reporter

Report of Investigation Concerning the Improper Disclosure of U.S. Department of Justice Information to a Member of the Media
………………………………………………..
Office of the Inspector General

Oversight and Review Division
………………………………………………..
May 2013
——————————————————————
https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2013/s1305.pdf
_________________________________________________
Dennis K. Burke, CORRUPT United States Attorney for the District of Arizona appointed by Barack Obama (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama), resigns August 29, 2011, after admitting he released a Fast and Furious memorandum to a reporter  Report of Investigation Concerning the Improper Disclosure of U.S. Department of Justice Information to a Member of the Media

image
_________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION

On August 16, 2011, Burke contacted an OIG investigative counsel by telephone and said that he had released the Dodson memorandum to
………………………………………………..
pg. 1
………………………………………………..
a reporter
………………………………………………..
pg. 2
_________________________________________________
image
_________________________________________________
Burke further told the OIG investigative counsel that he was at the airport preparing to board a flight and would be on vacation the following week, but that he would meet with the OIG for an interview when he returned. 3
………………………………………………..
3. The OIG investigative counsel memorialized Burke’s admission in an e-mail to OIG management immediately after the telephone call
………………………………………………..
However, Burke resigned as U.S. Attorney on August 29, 2011, and declined the OIG’s subsequent requests for an interview. 4
………………………………………………..
4. On December 13, 2011, Burke was interviewed by congressional investigators about several matters pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, including his disclosure of the Dodson memorandum to a reporter
………………………………………………..
At the OIG’s request, the staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform provided a copy of Burke’s transcribed interview and we cite to testimony Burke provided to congressional investigators in this report
………………………………………………..
pg. 3
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Advertisements

DELAWARE: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

Delaware flag
_________________________________________________
John Carney
@JohnCarneyDE
Delaware, At-Large District (D)
https://johncarney.house.gov
_________________________________________________

@John_Carney

_________________________________________________
Delaware flag
_________________________________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
_________________________________________________

======================================
United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

WYOMING: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

Wyoming flag
_________________________________________________
Cynthia M. Lummis (R)
Cynthia Lummis
@CynthiaLummis
Wyoming’s At-Large Congressional District

OVERSIGHT and GOVERNMENT REFORM
http://oversight.house.gov/
REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE MEMBER
https://lummis.house.gov
_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
======================================

United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

ALASKA: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

Alaska flag
________________________________________________
Don Young
@RepDonYoung
Alaska, At-Large District (R)
https://donyoung.house.gov
________________________________________________

Alaska flag
_________________________________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington DC, 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
_________________________________________________
Alaska flag
======================================
United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
Alaska flag
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

PUERTO RICO: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

Puerto Rico flag
_________________________________________________
Resident Commissioner
Pedro Pierluisi
@PedroPierluisi
@PierluisiPNP
Puerto Rico, At-Large District
https://pierluisi.house.gov
_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
======================================

United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

DISTRICT of COLUMBIA: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

District of Columbia flag
_________________________________________________
Eleanor Holmes Norton
@EleanorNorton
District of Columbia
OVERSIGHT and GOVERNMENT REFORM
http://oversight.house.gov/
DEMOCRAT COMMITTEE MEMBER
https://norton.house.gov
_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
======================================

United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S. @IRSnews) ʟ I a R S LIE 2

I.R.S. ʟ I a R S

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE LIE
——————————————————————
SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT
authorizes a DIRECT NONAPPORTIONED TAX

Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S. @IRSnews) Frivilous 2

Unanimous U.S. SUPREME COURT TRUTH
——————————————————————
It is an ERRONEOUS ASSUMPTION that the 16th AMENDMENT PROVIDES POWER to LEVY a DIRECT INCOME TAX NOT SUBJECT to the REGULATION of APPORTIONMENT

[240 U.S. 1 pg.11]

36 S.Ct. 236 (36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 236)
60 L.Ed. 493
——————————————————————
http://laws.findlaw.com/us/240/1.html
………………………………………………..
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=240&invol=1
………………………………………………..
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/case.html
………………………………………………..
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/
_________________________________________________
Note how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) L I a R S base their LIE on Brushaber v. Union Pac. R.R., 240 U.S. 1, 12-19 (1916)

This is one of the IRS’s very convenient LIES, since the UNANIMOUS Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) statement showing the frivolous argument of the IRS’s contention is on PAGE 11, not just hidden somewhere between pages 12-19

Treasury

Justice

House of Representatives

Senate

Judiciary

Ways and Means
Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S. @IRSnews) Frivolous Taxpayer C 2

Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S. @IRSnews) Frivolous Taxpayer
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS-Debunks-Frivolous-Tax-Arguments-2014
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov

Introduction
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolous-Tax-Arguments-Introduction
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov

Section I (A to C)
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolous-Tax-Arguments-Section-I-A-to-C
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov

Section I (D to E)
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolous-Tax-Arguments-Section-I-D-to-E
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov

Section II
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolous-Tax-Arguments-Section-II
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov

Section III
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolous-Tax-Arguments-Section-III
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov

Section IV
——————————————————————
http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Anti-Tax-Law-Evasion-Schemes-Law-and-Arguments-Section-IV
_________________________________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS – IRS.gov
_________________________________________________
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf
_________________________________________________