Tag Archives: COMPLAINT

Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Circuit Judge, 20th Judicial Circuit Court of Houston County, (Civil Division, Dothan) Alabama, invited to ALTER or AMEND his NOVEL LEGAL THEORY Judgment, Monday, March 27, 2017 (3/27/2017) 9:50:07 AM (38-CV-2015-900261.00)


_________________________________________________
Unified Judicial System

State of Alabama

AlaFile E-Notice

38-CV-2015-900261.00

To: Jerry Michael Blevins
ATTYJMBlev@LawOfficeOfJerryMBlevins.com

Judge: Henry D. “Butch” Binford

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Brian Ralph Beasley

38-CV-2015-900261.00

The following matter was Filed on 3/27/2017 9:50:07 AM

C001

Motion to Vacate or Modify

[Filer: Blevins Jerry Michael]

Notice Date: 3/27/2017 9:50:07 AM

Carla H. Woodall
Circuit Court Clerk
Houston County, Alabama
P.O. Drawer 6406
Dothan, AL 36302
334-677-4859
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 51

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Beasley Brian Ralph
Defendant

Civil Action No.: CV-2015-900261

MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves the Court to alter or amend the judgment previously rendered in this cause, and in support thereof says as follows:

Relevant Procedural History

1. On May 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this cause seeking damages stemming from an assault and battery committed on his person by Defendant on or about February 9, 2015

2. On July 2, 2015, Defendant filed his answer

3. On February 21, 2017, a bench trial occurred at which Defendant failed to attend in-person or through counsel

The only testimony presented at trial was Plaintiff’s, which was uncontroverted by other admissible evidence

4. On February 23, 2017, the Court rendered a final judgment in favor of Defendant

Discussion

5. Plaintiff contends that pursuant to Rule 55, Ala.R.Civ.P., because Defendant failed to appear at trial in-person or through counsel, he was entitled to a default judgment against Defendant on the assault and battery claim

See Seventh Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.,

364 So.2d 1173 (Ala. 1978)

(A party who fails to appear on the day the case is set for trial is in default);

and

Cassioppi v. Damico,

536 So.2d 938 (Ala. 1988)

(A judgment entered after one party fails to appear at trial is treated as a default judgment)

6. Plaintiff further contends that because his trial testimony was uncontroverted by other

1
_________________________________________________
admissible evidence, he was entitled to an award of damages stemming from the assault and battery

7. Plaintiff contends the Court erred in not granting him a judgment, and in not awarding appropriate damages, on the assault and battery claim

WHEREFORE Plaintiff requests that the Court alter or amend the judgment previously entered in this cause, and grant him a default judgment against Defendant, and award him damages in the sum of $30,000.00, on the assault and battery claim, for the reasons set forth herein

Jerry M. Blevins
(BLE003)
Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:
Law Office of Jerry M. Blevins
Carr, Riggs and Ingram Building
7550 Halcyon Summit Drive, Suite 100
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
(334) 262-7600 (Voice)
(334) 262-7644 (Fax)
E-Mail: ATTYJMBlev@LawOfficeOfJerryMBlevins.com

2

Filing
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 51

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing upon:

Mr. Brian Ralph Beasley
368 Hanchey Field Road
Daleville, Alabama 36322

via electronic transmission and / or by depositing a copy of the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid this 27th day of March, 2017

Jerry M. Blevins
_________________________________________________
Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP) VII. JUDGMENT Rule 55.
………………………………………………..
(a) Entry
(b) Judgment
(1) By the Clerk

Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption

The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of judgment by default when the default arises from failure to appear on the day the case is set for trial

Rule 55(a) authorizes the clerk to enter defaults upon the civil docket when the party fails to plead or otherwise defend
——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Seventh Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.
364 So. 2d 1173
(Ala. 1978)
77-602
………………………………………………..
Alabama Supreme Court

December 1, 1978
——————————————————————
http://www.ecases.us/case/ala/c1102643/wonder-v-southbound-records-inc
——————————————————————
(A party who fails to appear on the day the case is set for trial is in default)
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1102643/wonder-v-southbound-records-inc/
——————————————————————
http://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1978/364-so-2d-1173-1.html
_________________________________________________
Cassioppi v. Damico
536 So. 2d 938
(Ala. 1988)
87-965
………………………………………………..
Alabama Supreme Court

November 18, 1988
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1932665/cassioppi-v-damico/
——————————————————————
(A judgment entered after one party fails to appear at trial is treated as a default judgment)
——————————————————————
https://casetext.com/case/cassioppi-v-damico
_________________________________________________
Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Houston County Circuit Court, 20th Judicial Circuit Judge, Dothan, Alabama (since February 12 2008) Huntingdon College (@HuntingdonColl) University of Alabama School of Law (@UALawSchool) former Veteran Prosecutor, in the Assault and Battery Civil case: Plaintiff v. Brian Ralph Beasley, Defendant (of Daleville, Dale County, Alabama) WHO FAILED TO APPEAR on the DAY the CASE (38-CV-2015-900261.00) WAS SET FOR TRIAL (February 21 2017) on February 23, 2017, espoused a NEW LEGAL THEORY when he ENTERED JUDGMENT for the DEFENDANT CONTRARY to Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP) VII. JUDGMENT Rule 55: The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT when the DEFAULT arises from FAILURE TO APPEAR on the day the case is set for trial
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-1rB
_________________________________________________

Henry D. “Butch” Binford, Houston County Circuit Court, 20th Judicial Circuit Judge, Dothan, Alabama (since February 12, 2008), Huntingdon College (@HuntingdonColl), University of Alabama School of Law (@UALawSchool), former Veteran Prosecutor, in the Assault and Battery Civil case: Plaintiff v. Brian Ralph Beasley, Defendant (of Daleville, Dale County, Alabama) WHO FAILED TO APPEAR on the DAY the CASE (38-CV-2015-900261.00) WAS SET FOR TRIAL (February 21, 2017), on February 23, 2017, espoused a NEW LEGAL THEORY when he ENTERED JUDGMENT for the DEFENDANT, CONTRARY to Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP), VII. JUDGMENT, Rule 55: The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT when the DEFAULT arises from FAILURE TO APPEAR on the day the case is set for trial


_________________________________________________
Unified Judicial System

State of Alabama

AlaFile E-Notice

38-CV-2015-900261.00

To: Hein Vernon Paul
vern@heinlaw.net

Judge: Henry D. “Butch” Binford

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v. Brian Ralph Beasley

The following matter was Filed on 2/23/2017 11:13:44 AM

Notice Date: 2/23/2017 11:13:44 AM

Carla H. Woodall
Circuit Court Clerk
Houston County, Alabama
P.O. Drawer 6406
Dothan, AL 36302
334-677-4859

Order of Judgment
_________________________________________________
DOCUMENT 40

In the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama

Plaintiff

v.

Beasley Brian Ralph
Defendant

Case No.: CV-2015-900261.00

ORDER

Upon consideration of the evidence and testimony presented herein, the Court finds that the evidence does not establish by a preponderance of the evidence the elements of the claims set out in the complaint

Accordingly, judgment is entered for the Defendant

Costs taxed as paid

Done this 23rd day of February, 2017

Henry D. “Butch” Binford
Circuit Judge
_________________________________________________
Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure (ARCP)
VII. JUDGMENT
Rule 55.
(a) Entry
(b) Judgment
(1) By the Clerk

Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption

The rule eliminates the requirement of notice prior to entry of judgment by default when the default arises from failure to appear on the day the case is set for trial

Rule 55(a) authorizes the clerk to enter defaults upon the civil docket when the party fails “to plead or otherwise defend”

Is the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, Corrupt and / or Just Inept❓

Is the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, Corrupt and / or Just Inept❓

Friday, January 2, 2015, Billy Shaun McGhee of Smith and McGhee P.C., 211 W. Main Street, Suite 1, Dothan, Alabama 36301, was Retained for $300.00 (Three-Hundred Dollars), Receipt No. 911961, to assist with the recovery of a client’s property
image
Sunday, January 18, 2015, 5:44 PM, B. Shaun McGhee’s Legal Assistant was advised via e-mail, by the client, that the parties who had the client’s property, had moved to a NEW address, and provided the NEW address
image

image

image

February 14, 2015, 9:39 AM, B. Shaun McGhee’s office was requested via e-mail, to provide the date the letter had been sent to the parties who had the client’s property
image

image

image

image
February 24, 2015

Complaint Against a Lawyer
B. Shaun McGhee
was mailed to the Alabama State Bar
Complaint Against a Lawyer

Complaint Against a Lawyer

Complaints Against a Lawyer
Complaints Against Alabama Lawyers
Complaint Against an Alabama Lawyer
“A lawyer who is accused of misconduct suffers whether or not he is found to be at fault”

UNFORTUNATELY, the ALABAMA STATE BAR, CENTER for PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION, OFFICE of the GENERAL COUNSEL, does NOT advise the general public what this SUFFERing is
Complaint Against an Alabama Lawyer

Complaint Against an Alabama Lawyer
Your complaint will receive the Alabama State Bar’s prompt attention and every attempt will be made to resolve your complaint in a manner which is fair to both you and the lawyer

IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE THE Alabama State Bar WILL MAKE EVERY ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE YOUR COMPLAINT IN A MANNER WHICH IS FAIR TO BOTH YOU AND THE LAWYER, there is some swampland available for sale in Louisiana

Alabama State Bar
Center for Professional Responsibility
415 Dexter Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36104
334-269-1515
http://www.alabar.org

February 24, 2015, around 1:30 pm, B. Shaun McGhee provided the client a copy of the letter which had been sent to the parties OLD address, after a meeting regarding an unrelated matter

The letter was dated January [NO DAY] 2015
image
It is interesting that the letter had NO DAY provided, since other letters from McGhee’s office have a complete date

March 12, 2014
(actually March 12 2015)
image
September 4, 2014
image

February 24, 2015
image
PS Form 3811 Domestic Return Receipt 7001 1140 0001 5356 0781, showed that the letter had been signed for on Thursday, January 22, 2015, 11:39 am
image

image
The United States Postal Service’s web-site’s Certified Mail Tracking Number screen showed that item 7001 1140 0001 5356 0781 had been mailed to the parties OLD address, Wednesday, January 21, 2015, 3:32 pm
image

This was three (3) days AFTER the client had advised McGhee’s office that the parties had moved to a NEW address

McGhee refused to rectify the situation by sending the letter to the NEW address
image
McGhee also did NOT provide the Certified Mail Receipt from the United States Postal Service
image
A Certified Mail Receipt looks like this
image
Or just a receipt from the USPS, showing the DAY the item was mailed
image
February 26, 2015

Alabama State Bar
Center for Professional Responsibility
Disciplinary Commission
Office of General Counsel

Mr. Billy Shaun McGhee
Attorney at Law
PO Box 1225
Dothan AL 36302-1225

Re: CSP 2015-345
Complaint

Dear Mr. McGhee

Enclosed is a copy of a complaint / letter received in this office from the above-referenced individual concerning you

Rather than opening a formal investigative file at this time, you are requested to review the enclosed and submit, in writing, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this letter, your comments concerning the enclosed complaint / letter

In your response, you may include copies of any documents which are relevant to this inquiry

Please submit the original and one copy of your written response and enclosures to this office within fourteen (14) days from the date of this letter

Robyn Bernier
Investigator / Paralegal
For the Office of the General Counsel
image
March 12, 2014
(actually March 12 2015)

B. Shaun McGhee sent
Robyn Bernier
Alabama State Bar
The Disciplinary Commission
P. O. Box 671
Montgomery, AL 36101

RE: CSP No. 2014-345
(actually CSP 2015-345)
Complaint
image
Thursday, April 2, 2015

Alabama State Bar
The Disciplinary Commission
Telephone: 334-269-1515
P.O. Box 671
Montgomery, AL 36101
Fax: 334/261-6311
Delivery Address
415 Dexter Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36104

CSP 2015-345
Complaint against Billy Shaun McGhee

The Disciplinary Commission of the Alabama State Bar has received the complaint that you filed against the above-referenced attorney

A copy of your complaint was forwarded to the attorney and a copy of the attorney’s response to your complaint is enclosed

Two attorneys in the Office of General Counsel of the Alabama State Bar have reviewed your complaint and the attorney’s response to the complaint

In view of the nature and content of the complaint and the enclosed response of the attorney, we will take no further action in this matter

Robyn Bernier
Investigator / Paralegal
For the Office of the General Counsel
image

There is NOT any evidence in the record, that the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, requested the Certified Mail Receipt, showing the DAY item 7001 1140 0001 5356 0781 was mailed, from B. Shaun McGhee

There is NOT any evidence in the record, that the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, requested a Receipt from the United States Postal Service, showing the DAY item 7001 1140 0001 5356 0781 was mailed, from B. Shaun McGhee

There is NOT any evidence in the record, that the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, accessed the United States Postal Service’s web-site’s Certified Mail Tracking Number screen, to see what DAY item 7001 1140 0001 5356 0781 was mailed by McGhee’s office

THE ALABAMA STATE BAR, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, DOES NOT CARE IF YOU ADVISE AN ALABAMA ATTORNEY’s OFFICE THAT THE PARTIES THEY ARE TO SEND A LETTER TO, HAVE MOVED TO A NEW ADDRESS, AND THEY SEND THE LETTER TO THE OLD ADDRESS, AND REFUSE TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION BY MAILING THE LETTER TO THE NEW ADDRESS

Thursday, April 9, 2015 letter from client to Robyn Bernier, Alabama State Bar
Center for Professional Responsibility
Disciplinary Commission
Office of General Counsel
image
Friday, April 17, 2015

We are in receipt of your request for reconsideration of the above-referenced matter

The Alabama State Bar only has jurisdiction over violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct

Your initial complaint, the respondent attorney’s response, and your recent request were independently reviewed by two lawyers in this office

They have concluded that there appears to be no new information which warrants a formal investigation

Therefore, no further action will be taken in this matter in accordance with our earlier decision
image
May 5, 2015 letter from client to Alabama State Bar
Center for Professional Responsibility
Disciplinary Commission
Office of General Counsel

June 25, 2015

We are in receipt of your request for reconsideration of the above-referenced matter

The Alabama State Bar only has jurisdiction over violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct

Your initial complaint, the respondent attorney’s response, and your recent request were independently reviewed by two lawyers in this office

They have concluded that there appears to be no new information which warrants a formal investigation

Therefore, no further action will be taken in this matter in accordance with our earlier decision
image
December 16, 2015 letter from client to Alabama State Bar
Center for Professional Responsibility
Disciplinary Commission
Office of General Counsel
image
January 19, 2016

We are in receipt of your latest request for reconsideration of the above-referenced matter

The information you provided, your initial complaint and the attorney’s response were reviewed thoroughly and independently by two attorneys in the Office of General Counsel

While we can understand that you feel this is not a satisfactory resolution of your complaint, not every complaint constitutes a rule violation or has sufficient prosecutive merit

Your complaint was processed and investigated according to our procedures

In view of the fact that procedures were properly followed and a final determination made, there is nothing further we can do

Any other information received from you regarding this matter will be placed with your original complaints

However, no response from us will be forthcoming
image

THE ALABAMA STATE BAR, CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, does NOT have PROCEDURES in place to request that an attorney provide a Certified Mail Receipt to show the DAY the item was mailed, nor to access the USPS’ web-site’s Certified Mail Tracking Number screen and look up the DAY an item was mailed, when they are conducting a so-called “investigation”

WARNING: The Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, does NOT care if you advise an Alabama attorney’s office to make a change, and the Alabama attorney’s office ignores you, and refuses to rectify the situation

That is PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

WARNING: The Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, does NOT seem to think that if you retain an attorney to write a letter, that you, as the client, should be allowed to review that letter before it is mailed

What does the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, have in common with s Ye olde England star chamber❓

Two attorneys in the Office of General Counsel of the Alabama State Bar have reviewed your complaint and the attorney’s response to the complaint
In view of the nature and content of the complaint and the enclosed response of the attorney, we will take no further action in this matter

“Two attorneys in the Office of General Counsel of the Alabama State Bar have reviewed your complaint”

TRANSLATION: “Two NAMELESS, FACELESS, BUREAUCRATS in the Office of General Counsel of the Alabama State Bar have reviewed your complaint”

Your initial complaint, the respondent attorney’s response, and your recent request were independently reviewed by two lawyers in this office
They have concluded that there appears to be no new information which warrants a formal investigation
Therefore, no further action will be taken in this matter in accordance with our earlier decision

” . . . were independently reviewed by two lawyers in this office”

TRANSLATION: ” . . . were independently reviewed by two NAMELESS, FACELESS, BUREAUCRATS in this office”

Duplicate

The information you provided your initial complaint and the attorney’s response were reviewed thoroughly and independently by two attorneys in the Office of General Counsel

” . . . were reviewed thoroughly and independently by two attorneys in the Office of General Counsel”

TRANSLATION: ” . . . were reviewed thoroughly and independently by two NAMELESS, FACELESS, BUREAUCRATS in the Office of General Counsel”

JUDGES in ALABAMA have more “PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY” than the NAMELESS, FACELESS, BUREAUCRAT attorneys / lawyers who “independently” review complaints at the Alabama State Bar, Center for Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Commission, Office of General Counsel, who might be too YELLOW-BELLIED to sign off on their “determinations,” because maybe they do NOT want the notoriety of being responsible for some of the worst decisions in Alabama State Bar history

The Supreme Court of Alabama, through the Alabama State Bar, regulates lawyer conduct in this state

The Alabama State Bar’s grievance system was established by the Supreme Court of Alabama to enforce uniform standards of professional conduct for lawyers

All lawyers who practice law in Alabama must be members of the Alabama State Bar

Alabama Supreme Court
Mr. Robert G. Esdale
Clerk of the Court
300 Dexter Avenue
Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741

The Judicial System Study Commission of Alabama
Mr. Randy Helms
Administrative Director of Courts
300 Dexter Avenue
Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741

Alabama Judicial Conference
Mr. Randy Helms
Administrative Director of Courts
300 Dexter Avenue
Montgomery, Alabama 36104-2714

@LutherStrange

Alabama Attorney General
Luther Strange
501 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, Alabama 36130

@GovernorBentley

Alabama Governor
Robert Bentley
State Capitol
600 Dexter Avenue, Room N-104
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-2751

@HarriAnneSmith

Alabama Senator
Harri Anne Smith
P O Box 483
Slocomb, Alabama 36375

@SteveClouse

Alabama Representative
Steve Clouse
11 South Union Street, Suite 410-D
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-2950

@AlabamaStateBar

Alabama State Bar
Mr. Keith B. Norman
Executive Director / Secretary
P. O. Box 671
Montgomery, Alabama 36101

Steven Grodnitzky, Acting Manager, EO Technical Unit directed the preparation of a Sensitive Case Report regarding the “Tea Party cases”

Steven Grodnitzky
Steven Grodnitzky, Acting Manager, EO Technical Unit directed the preparation of a Sensitive Case Report regarding the “Tea Party cases”
70.
Steven Grodnitzky
Acting Manager
EO Technical Unit
102. April 2010
99.
102. April 2010 – July 2010
105. July 2010
113.
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-yG
________________________________________________
IRS AND TIGTA MANAGEMENT FAILURES RELATED TO 501(c)(4)
http://www.hsgac.senate.gov
Sep 5, 2014
D. Handling Other Tea Party Cases in Cincinnati: February to
alerted the EO Technical Unit to the potentially high profile
264 5/17/11 Sensitive Case Report, prepared by Carter
——————————————————————
http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/report_-irs-and-tigta-mgmt-failures-related-to-501c4-sept-5-2014
________________________________________________
Report – Committee on Oversight and Government Reform – U.S.
https://oversight.house.gov
4A: IRS
June 17, 2011
65
Sensitive Case Report
Tea Party cases
The September 2012 sensitive case report
Tax Law Specialist in
June 14, 2013
Q. Okay. Now, sir, in this
EO Technical Unit
——————————————————————
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/4-10-14-CONTEMPT-REPORT-Full-Committee-Business-Meeting-Lois-Lerner1.pdf
________________________________________________
[PDF] H.Res. – Congress.gov
› crpt › hrpt415
https://www.congress.gov
Apr 14, 2014
Tax Law Specialist in
Fig.4A: IRS for EO Technical Unit
Sensitive Case Report
Tea Party cases
——————————————————————
https://www.congress.gov/113/crpt/hrpt415/CRPT-113hrpt415.pdf
________________________________________________
lois lerner’s involvement in the irs targeting of tax-exempt
https://oversight.house.gov
Mar 11, 2014
Technical Unit to subject to a “multi-tier review” system. 11
Tea Party cases
for these cases? Thanks in advance Sensitive Case Report
Tax Law Specialist in EO Technical Unit
——————————————————————
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Lerner-Report1.pdf
________________________________________________
lawsuit – American Center for Law and Justice
media.aclj.org
Jun 25, 2013
Acting Director of the Office
EO Technical Unit
(Defendant Grodnitzky) directed the preparation of a Sensitive Case Report regarding the “Tea Party cases”
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
________________________________________________
Untitled – Bloomberg BNA
Bureau of National Affairs
der.nsf
requests for guidance or assistance from the EO Technical Unit so that
Related Recommendation: Revise the process or develop a more
Sensitive Case Report
the during the period in 2010 when no determinations
Tea Party cases
——————————————————————
https://www.bna.com/uploadedFiles/hlrc_ug.pdf
________________________________________________
Plaintiff’s First Amended Verified Complaint for Declaratory
Feb 8, 2012
Acting Manager of the , was aware of the existence and application of the IRS. Targeting Scheme
EO Technical Unit
need for a on the Sensitive Case Report
Tea Party cases
——————————————————————
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/ComplaintTTVvIRS.pdf

http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/TTV.v.IRS.php
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

Charles “Chuck” Schumer (@SenSchumer) Democrat, Senator, New York (July 21, 2010), announced his intention to introduce the “DISCLOSE Act,” which he stated would target corporations that engaged in free speech and would “make them think twice”

Chuck Schumer
(@SenSchumer)
Democrat Senator
New York
DISCLOSE Act
100.
July 21, 2010
119.
July 27, 2010

________________________________________________
Senate Ethics Complaint Filed by Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org
Senator Schumer said the DISCLOSE Act would target certain speakers, and “make them think twice”
2 jun 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2014/06/02/senate-ethics-complaint-filed-by-center-for-competitive-politics/
________________________________________________
The IRS Harassment Scandal: A Timeline of “Reform” – Center for
http://www.campaignfreedom.org
political expenditures and “make them think twice. … ] should not be underestimated. …. : Senator Chuck Schumer formally introduces the DISCLOSE Act July 21, 2010
17 jun 2013
——————————————————————
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2013-09-16_Timeline_IRS-Scandal_Documenting-Efforts-By-The-Regulatory-Community-To-Police-Political-Speech-Full-Version-1.pdf
________________________________________________
How Politics Led the IRS to Target Conservative Tax – Committee on
https://oversight.house.gov
DISCLOSE Act, sponsored by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) and …. The IRS sent disks …. . …… proposed legislation will make “them think twice”
22 jul. 2010
21 July 2010
——————————————————————
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/How-Politics-Led-to-the-IRS-Targeting-Staff-Report-6.16.14.pdf
________________________________________________
2014 02 27 Timeline IRS Scandal Documenting Efforts by the
https://www.scribd.com
political expenditures and “make them think twice. … , : Senator Chuck Schumer formally introduces the DISCLOSE Act …
July 27, 2010: The DISCLOSE Act fails its first vote in the Senate
Site mobile
25 avr. 2015
July 21 2010
——————————————————————
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/263072218/2014-02-27-Timeline-IRS-Scandal-Documenting-Efforts-by-the-Regulatory-Community-to-Police-Political-Speech-Full-Version

http://docslide.us/documents/2014-05-20-timeline-irs-scandal-documenting-efforts-by-the-regulatory-community.html
________________________________________________
(DISCLOSE) Act – Democratic Policy & Communications Center
http://www.dpc.senate.gov
On July 27, 2010, the Senate failed to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to … In response, Senator Schumer introduced the Democracy Is Strengthened by …. On , , Senator Schumer introduced S. 3628, a revised version of the
July 21 2010
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================