Category Archives: Judicial Watch

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson: “Furthermore, there is no need to balance the need against the impact that the revelation of any record could have on candor in future executive decision making, since any harm that might flow from the public revelation of the deliberations at issue here has already been self-inflicted; the emails and memorandum that are responsive to the subpoena were described in detail in a report by the Department of Justice Inspector General that has already been released to the public” (January 2016) Fast and Furious

_________________________________________________
United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Judicial Watch, Inc.

v.

National Archives and Records Administration

No. 1:15-cv-01740-RBW

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
………………………………………………..
February 2, 2016

54 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/JW-v-NARA-summary-judgment-01740.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

Judicial Watch Panel:

Clinton Scandal Update – Emails and the Clinton Foundation
………………………………………………..
September 29, 2016

31 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/160929-Judicial-Watch-Clinton-Email-Event.pdf
………………………………………………..
image
——————————————————————

_________________________________________________
Government Oversite Fast and furious ruling 01332
………………………………………………..
January 19, 2016
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/government-oversite-fast-furious-ruling-01332/
………………………………………………..
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, United States House of Representatives

v.

Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States

Civil Action No. 12-1332 (ABJ)

Memorandum Opinion and Order

32 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Government-Oversite-Fast-and-furious-ruling-01332.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

JW Exposes Clinton Misconduct in Court
………………………………………………..
March 13, 2015
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/jw-exposes-clinton-misconduct-in-court/
_________________________________________________

Judge John D. Bates: “at best it means the Department has been slow to react to this Court’s previous Order. At worst it means the Department has ignored that Order until now.” “The government’s arguments for even more time are unconvincing” (Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:12-cv-01510)) Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept) Eric Holder (@EricHolder) announced his resignation two (2) days after Judge Bates denied Justice Department request (Fast and Furious)

_________________________________________________
Federal Court Denies DOJ Motion for Delay, Orders Release of Fast and Furious Documents List to Judicial Watch by October 22
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)
September 25, 2014
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/federal-court-denies-doj-motion-delay-orders-release-fast-furious-documents-list-judicial-watch-october-22/
_________________________________________________
Fast and Furious Vaughn, 01510 – September 23 Order
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)
September 23, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/fast-furious-vaughn-01510-september-23-order/
_________________________________________________
image

U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth: “where there is evidence of government wrong-doing and bad faith, as here, limited discovery is appropriate, even though it is exceedingly rare in FOIA cases” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)) January 10, 2017

_________________________________________________
Judicial Watch Asks for Further Discovery in Clinton Email Benghazi Lawsuit over Possible State Department ‘Wrongdoing or Bad Faith’
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

January 18, 2017
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-asks-discovery-clinton-email-benghazi-lawsuit-possible-state-department-wrongdoing-bad-faith/
_________________________________________________
Judicial Watch: Second Federal Court Grants Discovery in Clinton Email Case
………………………………………………..
March 29, 2016
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-second-federal-court-grants-discovery-in-clinton-email-case/
_________________________________________________
JW v. State

Memorandum and discovery 01242
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

March 29, 2016
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-memorandum-discovery-01242/
_________________________________________________
image

Barack Obama’s (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama) CORRUPT Administration, Politicized Eric Holder (@EricHolder) Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) United States of America, North Carolina State Conference of Branches of the NAACP, Plaintiffs vs. North Carolina, Christina Kelley Gallegos-Merrill, Judicial Watch, Incorporated (@JudicialWatch), Defendants

_________________________________________________
In re Appeal of CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL
………………………………………………..
December 12, 2012
——————————————————————
https://www.nccivitas.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/20121212135610916.pdf
_________________________________________________
16-1529 – US v. State of North Carolina

CA4-16-01529
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01529/content-detail.html
_________________________________________________
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion For Intervention By Christina Kelley Gallegos-Merrill and Judicial Watch, Inc.(U.S. v. North Carolina Board of Elections and Kim Starch (1:13 CV 861))
………………………………………………..
December 10, 2013
——————————————————————http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/memorandum-of-law-in-support-if-motion-for-intervention-by-christina-kelley-gallegos-merrill-and-judicial-watch-inc-u-s-v-north-carolina-board-of-elections-and-kim-starch-113-cv-861/
_________________________________________________
Answer in Intervention of Defendant – Intervenors Chistina K. Gallegos-Merrill and Judicial Watch (U.S. v. North Carolina Board of Elections and Kim Starch (1:13 CV 861))
………………………………………………..
December 10, 2013
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/answer-in-intervention-of-defendant-intervenors-chistina-k-gallegos-merrill-and-judicial-watchu-s-v-north-carolina-board-of-elections-and-kim-starch-113-cv-861/
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..
December 10, 2013
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/NC-Memo-of-Law-Intervention-as-filed.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image
………………………………………………..

——————————————————————
https://www.scribd.com/mobile/document/201236178/NC-Reply-Brief-of-Judicial-Watch
_________________________________________________
Judicial Watch Defends North Carolina Voter ID Law, Additional Protections against Voter Fraud
………………………………………………..
December 11, 2013
——————————————————————https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-defends-north-carolina-voter-id-law-additional-protections-against-voter-fraud/
_________________________________________________
Judicial Watch and AEF File Amicus in Support of North Carolina Election Integrity Measure
………………………………………………..
September 9, 2014
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-aef-file-amicus-support-north-carolina-election-integrity-measure/
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..
September 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/2014.9.17%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Judicial%20Watch,%20Inc.%20in%20support%20of%20Apellees.pdf
_________________________________________________
Order regarding Oral Argument
………………………………………………..
Moritz College of Law

September 22, 2014
——————————————————————
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/NC65.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image
_________________________________________________
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
………………………………………………..
September 25, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/published/141845.p.pdf
_________________________________________________
Order Reversing in part and Affirming in part District Court’s
………………………………………………..
October 1, 2014
——————————————————————
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/NC72.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
1:13-cv-0066
………………………………………………..
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

October 1, 2014
——————————————————————
https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/assets/081-1_judgment_order_filed.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
United States v. North Carolina Reply Brief
………………………………………………..
June 15, 2016
——————————————————————
https://www.justice.gov/crt/file/867806/download
_________________________________________________
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
No. 16-2193
(1:13-cv-00660-TDS-JEP)
(1:13-cv-00658-TDS-JEP)
(1:13-cv-00861-TDS-JEP)
North Carolina State Conference of Branches of the NAACP
United States of America
Plaintiffs
Judicial Watch, Incorporated
denies injunction
Defendants
Judge Motz
Judge Wynn
Judge Floyd
………………………………………………..
October 19, 2016

2 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Order.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

CLEAN HOUSE: Exposing our Government’s Secrets and Lies (Threshold Editions @Threshold_Books Simon and Schuster @SimonSchuster) Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch) Exposes Barack Obama (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama) Administration Alphabet Soup of CORRUPTION

CLEAN HOUSE Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

Fast and Furious

ATF (Alcohol Tobacco Firearms)

IRS Targeting Scandal (Lois Lerner)

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen

Hillary Clinton Email Scandal

Benghazi

White House

Voter Fraud

DOJ (Department of Justice)

Obamacare

House of Representatives

Senate

DHS

Immigration

USDA (Department of Agriculture)

Border Enforcement

8/26/2016 9:37 Tom Fitton Author Interview with Conservative Book Club

11/29/2016 58:01 8/31/2016 Q and A with Tom Fitton C-SPAN

9/13/2016 1:54:35 Point of View Radio Talk Point of View Livecast – September 13, 2016