Category Archives: District of Columbia

Herbert B. Dixon, Jr., CORRUPT D.C. Superior Court Judge, District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.) TAXPAYERS Bend Over for Barack Obama (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama) OBAMACARE (ACA) CORRUPTION CON JOB by the “local/state governments” of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate (Congress of the United States)

_________________________________________________
Vining v. DC Health Benefit Exchange Complaint
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

October 15, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/vining-v-dc-health-benefit-exchange-complaint/
………………………………………………..
8 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Vining-v-DC-Health-Benefit-Exchange-Complaint.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
JW Files Taxpayer Lawsuit to Stop Congress from Participating in D.C’s Small Business Exchange
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

October 15, 2014
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-taxpayer-lawsuit-stop-congress-participating-district-columbias-small-business-exchange/
_________________________________________________
Kirby Vining v. Executive Board of the District of Columbia Health Benefit Exchange Authority (No. 14-0006496)
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

October 22, 2014
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/cases/kirby-vining-v-executive-board-district-columbia-health-benefit-exchange-authority-14-0006496/
_________________________________________________
D.C. Government Concedes Law Does Not Allow for Congress to Obtain Obamacare in “Small Business Exchange”
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

January 7, 2015
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/d-c-government-concedes-law-not-allow-congress-obtain-obamacare-small-business-exchange/
_________________________________________________
Vining v. Exec Board DC Health Benefit Exchange
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

January 16, 2015

20 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Vining-v-Exec-Board-DC-Health-Benefit-Exchange-Motion-to-Dismiss-0006496.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
………………………………………………..
February 3, 2015

3 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.sbc.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=df54c3f3-cfec-4339-a90b-cb2ffe71c35f
_________________________________________________
image

image

image
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..
February 13, 2015

3 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.sbc.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=4f177137-33f0-43dd-9b17-0d6b4736fa4b
_________________________________________________
image

image

image
_________________________________________________
February 25, 2015
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit over Congress, Staff Health Insurance
………………………………………………..
February 26, 2015

1 pg.
——————————————————————
https://oag.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/oag/release_content/attachments/Judicial_Watch_Decision_Release_FINAL_REVISED.pdf
_________________________________________________
image
_________________________________________________
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

oag.dc.gov

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday,

February 26, 2015

Contact: Rob Marus, Communications Director (OAG): 202.724.5646; robert.marus@dc.gov

Ted Gest, Public Information Officer (OAG): 202.727.6283; ted.gest@dc.gov

Adam Hudson: (DC Health Link) 202.527.5622; adam.hudson@dc.gov

Linda Wharton Boyd: (DC Health Link) 202.351.9777; linda.wharton-boyd@dc.gov

Judge Dismisses Lawsuit over Congress, Staff Health Insurance Coverage through DC Health Link

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging the legality of Members of Congress and members of their staff obtaining health insurance coverage through the DC Health Link Small Group Marketplace, Attorney General Karl A. Racine and DC Health Benefit Exchange Executive Director Mila Kofman announced today

D.C. Superior Court Judge Herbert B. Dixon, Jr. ruled yesterday on a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch on behalf of District resident Kirby Vining

In his ruling, the judge concluded that

“the defendant exchange authority’s action in allowing members of Congress and their staff to participate in the District’s small business health options program is authorized by federal regulations”

He added that even if federal rules and regulations conflict with the D.C. law that created the District’s Health Benefit Exchange Authority, the court would conclude that the federal regulations preempt Judicial Watch’s interpretation of D.C. law

The ruling was a

“dismissal with prejudice,”

which means that, absent reversal on appeal, Vining is barred from bringing suit again in the Superior Court

Attorney General Racine said he was pleased with the decision

“With this decision, Members of Congress and their staff will be able to continue to purchase affordable health insurance through the District’s Health Benefit Exchange Authority,”

he said

“The Court issued a correct ruling under the law, and it is an appropriate decision that promotes the health and welfare of our community”

Executive Director Kofman also welcomed the decision

“All of our customers are important to us

We are pleased that we can continue to have Congress as one of our customers,”

she said

###
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..
April 27, 2015

35 pgs.
——————————————————————
http://www.dcogc.org/sites/default/files/vining_amicus_brief.pdf
_________________________________________________
Complaint
………………………………………………..
Citizens Against Government Waste

June 25, 2015
——————————————————————
http://www.ccagw.org/media/press-releases/ccagw-leads-coalition-calling-ethics-inquiry-over-questionable-obamacare
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
Vining v. DC Health Exchange appeal 242
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@Judicial Watch)

July 13, 2015
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/vining-v-dc-health-exchange-242/
_________________________________________________
Case Number 15-cv-242 In The District of
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

July 13, 2015
——————————————————————
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/07-28-15-Vining-appeal-242.pdf
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
Judicial Watch Appeals to Halt Spending on Congress’ Participation on the D.C. Small Business Health Benefit Exchange
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

August 10, 2015
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-appeals-to-halt-d-c-monies-being-spent-on-congress-participation-on-the-d-c-small-business-health-benefit-exchange/
_________________________________________________
The Fight to Halt Congress’s Obamacare Fraud
………………………………………………..
CNS News (@CNSNews)

Tom Fitton (@TomFitton)

August 13, 2015 | 11:29 AM EDT
——————————————————————
http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/tom-fitton/fight-halt-congresss-obamacare-fraud
_________________________________________________
Judicial Watch Appeals Court Hearing on Lawsuit to Stop Congress from Participating in D.C.’s Small Business Obamacare Exchange
………………………………………………..
Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch)

March 1, 2016
——————————————————————
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-appeals-court-hearing-on-lawsuit-to-stop-congress-from-participating-in-d-c-s-small-business-obamacare-exchange/
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..

——————————————————————
June 2016
——————————————————————
http://cases.justia.com/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/2016-14-cv-1322.pdf?ts=1465482680
_________________________________________________
KIRBY VINING v. COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 14-CV-1322 (D.C. 2016)

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
………………………………………………..
Filed: June 9th, 2016
——————————————————————
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3211615/kirby-vining-v-council-of-the-district-of-columbia/
_________________________________________________

………………………………………………..
Citizens Against Government Waste

July 7, 2016
——————————————————————
http://www.cagw.org/swineline/some-are-more-equal-others
_________________________________________________
image

image

image

image

image
_________________________________________________
4/28/2015 11:21 4/23/2015 American Commitment
………………………………………………..
Committee Votes to CONCEAL Docs FALSELY Certifying Congress a Small Business
SR – 428A
——————————————————————

First order of business, is consideration of authorizing the subpoena to Mila Kofman the Executive Director of the D.C. Health Benefit Exchange Authority

Uh

Authorization to issue the subpoena requires the consent of a majority of the Committee members

Let me give a very brief background on this

Uh

I’ve been concerned, uh, having found out that our healthcare coverage and that of our staff is being procured through the D.C. Health Link Small Business Exchange

Uh

That Exchange is obviously for small businesses under, the Obamacare Act

Uh

And as, uh, Chair of the Small Business Committee this, this seemed like a conflict, to me

Now, that Act specifically defines a small employer, as a business with an average of not more than one-hundred (100) employees in the past year, and that, is outlined on this, chart right here

It also, gives States and the District of Columbia the option, of further shrinking that number to not more than fifty (50) employees, and that’s what Washington, D.C. has done

They have chosen properly under the Act, to define small employer as a business that employs an average of not more than fifty (50) employees

Now nevertheless, uh, the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate, are participating, in the D.C. Small Business Exchange, for healthcare coverage, although obviously both bodies employ far more than fifty (50) people

Uh

As we looked into this, uh, things became even more worrisome because, we got redacted versions of the applications to the Exchange from the House, and the Senate, and they clearly, contained, misrepresentations, uh, and those misrepresentations including, include, listing the U.S. House, and the U.S. Senate as State or local government, attesting that the number of employees of each body, was forty-five (45)

That’s, pretty interesting since, just among members we have over double that number in the Senate, and, in the form, in the part of the form where, the applicant has to list all the employees to be covered, there were two (2) employees listed which were fake names

And so that, again is very disturbing

Uh

We have tried to get the un-redacted copies of these applications from the D.C. Health Link Exchange

We’re

We’re just talking about nine (9) pages

We simply want the un-redacted versions

They’ve failed to comply, and so that’s what this subpoena is about

Simply requesting the un-redacted versions of those nine (9) pages

So if we issue the subpoena and get those no one will be compelled to testify

That’s the sole target of the subpoena

Those un-redacted nine (9) pages

So with that I move to vote on consent to authorize, the subpoena

‘Course it’s been properly noticed

The

The clerk will call the roll
………………………………………………..
_________________________________________________
Sen. Vitter’s request to subpoena Affordable Care Act documents is rejected by Small Business Committee
………………………………………………..
Updated on Apr 23 2015 at 11:26 AM CDT

Bruce Alpert NOLA.com | Times-Picayune
——————————————————————
https://www.nola.com/articles/15791448/_sen_vitters_request_to_subpoe.amp?
_________________________________________________
Sen. David Vitter’s Obamacare subpoena bid doomed by five GOP defections
………………………………………………..
The Washington Times (@WashTimes)

Tom Howell Jr. (@TomHowellJr)

Thursday, April 23, 2015
——————————————————————
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/23/david-vitters-obamacare-subpoena-bid-doomed-gop/
_________________________________________________
Five Republicans buck GOP chairman on O-Care investigation
………………………………………………..
The Hill (@TheHill)

April 23, 2015 10:52 AM EDT
——————————————————————
http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/policy/healthcare/239843-five-republicans-vote-to-halt-gop-chairmans-obamacare-investigation
_________________________________________________
Republicans Block Vitter’s Obamacare Subpoena
………………………………………………..
National Journal (@NationalJournal)
——————————————————————
https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/28037
_________________________________________________
DISGUSTING Rand Votes to HIDE Congress’s Obamacare Exemption
………………………………………………..
Thursday, April 23, 2015
——————————————————————
http://www.targetliberty.com/2015/04/disgusting-rand-votes-to-hide-congresss.html?m=1
_________________________________________________
How Five Republicans Let Congress Keep Its Fraudulent Obamacare Subsidies
………………………………………………..
National Review (@NRO)

Brendan Bordelon (@BrendanBordelon)

May 7, 2015 1:26 PM
——————————————————————
https://www.nationalreview.com/article/418055/how-five-republicans-let-congress-keep-its-fraudulent-obamacare-subsidies-brendan?
_________________________________________________

DISTRICT of COLUMBIA: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

District of Columbia flag
_________________________________________________
Eleanor Holmes Norton
@EleanorNorton
District of Columbia
OVERSIGHT and GOVERNMENT REFORM
http://oversight.house.gov/
DEMOCRAT COMMITTEE MEMBER
https://norton.house.gov
_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
======================================

United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================