Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton Hillary Rodham Clinton) Commits PERJURY by LYING to the United States House of Representatives BENGHAZI Committee, but the Attorney General of the United States, Loretta Lynch; whom HRC offered a position in her administration, and is Best Mile High Club Buds with Slick Willy Bill Clinton (@BillClinton William Jefferson Clinton), and the U.S. Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept DOJ), do NOT want to influence the Presidential Election; on Tuesday, November 8, 2016, by giving President (@POTUS) Barack Obama (@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama) the opportunity to PARDON hiLIARy for her LIES to Americans and the American People’s House

7/7/2016 6:12 C-SPAN

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) questions FBI Director on Hillary Clinton Email Investigation (C-SPAN)

7/7/2016 6:08 Western Free Press

Trey Gowdy grills Jim Comey on Hillary Clinton Email Scandal

7/7/2016 6:00 CBS News

FBI chief grilled over Clinton emails

_________________________________________________
C-SPAN CREATED BY CABLE

HILLARY CLINTON EMAIL INVESTIGATION

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Rayburn Office Building

July 2016
——————————————————————
7/7/2016 1:51 Fox News

Gowdy grills Comey over Clinton’s ‘false statements’

Representative Trey Gowdy: Morning Director Comey

Uh

Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private email

Was that true❓

………………………………………………..

FBI Director James Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent …

——————————————————————

Congressman Trey Gowdy: So it was not true❓

………………………………………………..

FBI Director Jim Comey: Uh

Right

That’s what I said

——————————————————————

Representative Gowdy: Okay

Well, I’m, uh, looking for a little shorter answer so you and I are not, here quite as long

Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails; either sent or received

Was that true❓

………………………………………………..

FBI Director Comey: That’s not true

There were a small number of portion markings on I think three (3) of the documents

( ❓ )

——————————————————————

Congressman Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said: “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email”

“There is no classified material”

Was that true❓

………………………………………………..

Director James Comey: Uh

There was classified material emailed

——————————————————————

Trey Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said she used just one (1) device

Was that true❓

………………………………………………..

Director Jim Comey: She used multiple devices during the four (4) years, uh, of her term as Secretary of State

——————————————————————

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department

Was that true❓

………………………………………………..

James Comey: No

We found work-related emails, thousands, that were not, returned

——————————————————————

Trey: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account

Was that true❓

………………………………………………..

Jim Comey: That’s a harder one to answer

Uh

We found traces of work-related emails, ah, in, on devices or in slack-space

Whether they were deleted or whether when a server was changed out something happened to them

There’s no doubt that the work-related emails that were removed electronically from the, the email system

——————————————————————

Trey: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive

Did her lawyers read the email content individually❓

………………………………………………..

Comey: No

——————————————————————

TG: Well, in the interest of time and because I have a plane to catch tomorrow afternoon, I’m not going to go through any more of the false statements but I am going to ask you to put on your old hat

False exculpatory statements

They are used for what❓

………………………………………………..

JC: Well either for the, the substantive prosecution or for evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution

——————————————————————

TG: Exactly

Intent and consciousness of guilt

Right❓

Is that right❓

………………………………………………..

JC: Right

——————————————————————

TG: Con

Consciousness of guilt, and intent

Uh

In your old job you would prove intent as you just referenced, um, by, showing the jury evidence of a complex scheme that was designed for the very purpose, of concealing the public … record

And you would be arguing in addition to concealment the destruction that you and I just talked about or certainly the failure, to preserve

You would argue all of that under the heading, of content (sic – intent)

You would also, intent

You would also be arguing the pervasiveness of the scheme

When it started

When it ended

And the number of emails, whether they were originally classified or ( ? up-classified or unclassified ? )

You

You would argue all of that under, un, under the heading of, intent

You would also probably under common scheme or plan, argue the burn bags, of, daily calendar entries, or the missing daily calendar entries as a, common scheme or plan to … conceal

Two (2) days ago, uh, Director, you said a reasonable person in her position should have known a private email was no place to send, and receive classified … information

Eh

You’re right

An average person does know not to do that

Ah

This is no average … person

This is a former First Lady, a former United States Senator, and a former Secretary of State that the President … now contends, is the most competent, qualified person to be President since Jefferson

He didn’t say that in ’08 but he says it now

She affirmatively rejected efforts to give her a state . gov account

She kept these private emails for almost two (2) years and only turned them over to Congress … because we found out she had a private email … account

So you have a rogue email system set up before she took the oath of office, thousands of what we now know to be classified emails, some of which were classified at the time

One of her more frequent email comrades was in fact hacked and you don’t know whether or not she was, and this scheme took place over a long period of time and it resulted in the destruction of public records and yet you say there is insufficient evidence … of intent

You say she was extremely careless, but not intentionally so

Eh

You and I both know that intent is really difficult to prove

Very rarely do defendants announce:

On this day I intend to break this criminal Code section

Just to put everyone on notice I am going to break the law on this day

It never happens that way

You have to do it with circumstantial … evidence, or if you’re Congress and you realize how difficult it is to prove specific intent, you will formulate a statute that allows for negligence

_______________________________________________

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s