Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) CORRUPTION for IDIOTS, DUMMIES, and AVERAGE AMERICANS

The Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) LIES to the Congress of the United States of America

What makes you think the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) won’t LIE to you or any entity you may work for❓

When the Internal Revenue Service (I R S) decided to question Billie Murdock of Utah about her “alleged” Federal income tax liability, she did what the Taxpayer Bill of Rights lists as your Right

She had a Transcript of the meeting made, which included gems like the Internal Revenue Agent telling her to “never-mind that,” when Billie started asking questions the agent didn’t want to answer

If an Internal Revenue Agent tells you to “never mind that” when you are asking them about documents published in the Federal Register; which is notice to the public from the United States Federal Government, which is signed by the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, that is the biggest red flag, reminiscent of a matador flapping a big red cape in front of a bull
________________________________________________
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
________________________________________________
Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Frivolous Taxpayer IRS Liars
2.

The Supreme Court has

recognized that the sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves”
——————————————————————
The SUPREME COURT has

RECOGNIZED that the SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT AUTHORIZES a DIRECT NONAPPORTIONED TAX
Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Frivolous Taxpayer IRS Liars
7. Contention: The Sixteenth Amendment does not authorize a direct non-apportioned federal income tax on United States citizens

Numerous courts have both implicitly and explicitly recognized that the Sixteenth Amendment authorizes a non-apportioned direct income tax on United States citizens and that the federal tax laws are valid as applied
——————————————————————
… COURTS haveRECOGNIZED that the SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT AUTHORIZES a NON-APPORTIONED DIRECT INCOME TAX
_________________________________________________
What the UNANIMOUS SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES ACTUALLY RECOGNIZED
_________________________________________________
U.S. Supreme Court

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company

Argued October 14 and 15 1915

Decided January 24 1916

240 U.S. 1

36 S.Ct. 236

60 L.Ed. 493

(1916)

Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:
_________________________________________________
[240 U.S. 1, 17]

This is the text of the Amendment:

‘The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration’

(ratified February 3, 1913)
_________________________________________________
[240 U.S. 1, 11]

It is an

“ERRONEOUS ASSUMPTION”

“that the

16th AMENDMENT

PROVIDES” “POWER to LEVY”

a

“DIRECT” “INCOME TAX”

“NOT” “SUBJECT

to the

REGULATION

of

APPORTIONMENT

applicable to ALL OTHER

DIRECT TAXES”
——————————————————————
[240 U.S. 1, 10]

We are of opinion, however

[240 U.S. 1, 11]

that the confusion is not inherent, but rather arises from the conclusion that the 16th Amendment provides for a hitherto unknown power of taxation; that is, a power to levy an income tax which, although direct, should not be subject to the regulation of apportionment applicable to all other direct taxes

And the far-reaching effect of this erroneous assumption will be made clear by generalizing the many contentions advanced in argument to support it, as follows:
======================================
U.S. Supreme Court

Brushaber v. Union Pac. R.R.

Argued October 14 and 15 1915

Decided January 24 1916

240 U.S. 1

12 – 19

36 S.Ct. 236

239-42

60 L.Ed. 493

(1916)
——————————————————————
http://laws.findlaw.com/us/240/1.html
——————————————————————
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=240&invol=1
======================================
Case
——————————————————————
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/case.html
………………………………………………..
Syllabus
——————————————————————
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/
_________________________________________________
The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE LIE
………………………………………………..
the

SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT

authorizes a

DIRECT NONAPPORTIONED TAX …”
——————————————————————
The Unanimous U.S. SUPREME COURT TRUTH
………………………………………………..
It is an

ERRONEOUS ASSUMPTION

“that the

16th AMENDMENT

PROVIDES” “POWER to LEVY” a

“DIRECT” “INCOME TAX”

“NOT” “SUBJECT to the REGULATION of

APPORTIONMENT

applicable to ALL OTHER DIRECT TAXES”

[240 U.S. 1, 11]
——————————————————————
After the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States decided the two (2) cases regarding the Sixteenth (16th) Amendment; the “income tax amendment”:
——————————————————————
U.S. Supreme Court
Brushaber v. Union Pac. R.R.
(Brushaber v. Union P. R. Co.)
Argued October 14 and 15 1915
240 U.S. 1
12 – 19
36 S.Ct. 236 (36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 236)
239-42
60 L.Ed. 493
Decided January 24, 1916
(1916)
——————————————————————
U.S. Supreme Court
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
(JOHN R. STANTON, Appt.,
v.
BALTIC MINING COMPANY et al.)
Argued October 14 and 15, 1915
240 U.S. 103
36 S.Ct. 278
60 L.Ed. 546
No. 359
Decided February 21, 1916
(1916)
——————————————————————
Treasury Decision 2131 was approved, March 30, 1916, and held to be effective as of January 1, 1916
_________________________________________________
United States Taxpayers:
Who are They❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-Ih
_________________________________________________
IRS PRA Form 2555 OMB 1545-0067
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-Ji
_________________________________________________
Treasury Decision (T. D. 2313) Income Tax
53

(T. D. 2313)

Income tax
——————————————————————
INCOME TAX
——————————————————————
Taxability of interest from bonds and dividends on stock of domestic corporations owned by nonresident aliens, and the liabilities of nonresident aliens under section 2 of the act of October 3, 1913
——————————————————————
DOMESTIC CORPORATIONS owned by NONRESIDENT ALIENS, and the LIABILITIES of NONRESIDENT ALIENS
——————————————————————
TREASURY DEPARTMENT,

OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Washington, D. C., March 21, 1916

To collectors of internal revenue:

Under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railway Co., decided January 24, 1916, it is hereby ordered that income accruing to nonresident aliens in the form of interest from the bonds and dividends on the stock of domestic corporations is subject to the income tax imposed by the act of October 3, 1913
——————————————————————
decision of the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES in the case of BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY CO., decided JANUARY 24, 1916 … INCOME … to NONRESIDENT ALIENS … from DOMESTIC CORPORATIONS is subject to the INCOME TAX …
——————————————————————
Nonresident aliens are not entitled to the specific exemption designated in paragraph C of the income-tax law, but are liable for the normal and additional tax upon the entire net income
——————————————————————
NONRESIDENT ALIENS … are LIABLE for the … TAX upon … INCOME
——————————————————————
“from all property owned, and of every business, trade, or profession carried on in the United States,”
computed on the basis prescribed in the law”
——————————————————————
… all PROPERTY owned … every BUSINESS, TRADE, or PROFESSION carried on in the UNITED STATES …
——————————————————————
The responsible heads, agents, or representatives of nonresident aliens, who are in charge of the property owned or business carried on
Treasury Decision (T. D. 2313) Income Tax page 54
54
——————————————————————
… NONRESIDENT ALIENS … PROPERTY owned or BUSINESS carried on within the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
within the United States, shall make a full and complete return of the income therefrom on Form 1040, revised, and shall pay any and all tax, normal and additional, assessed upon the income received by them in behalf of their nonresident alien principals
——————————————————————
shall make a … RETURN of … INCOME … on FORM 1040 … and … pay … TAX … upon … INCOME received … in behalf of … NONRESIDENT ALIEN …
——————————————————————
The person, firm, company, copartnership, corporation, joint stock company, or association, and insurance company in the United States, citizen or resident alien, in whatever capacity acting, having the control, receipt, disposal, or payment of fixed or determinable annual or periodic gains, profits, and income of whatever kind, to a nonresident alien, under any contract, or otherwise, which payment shall represent income of a nonresident alien from the exercise of any trade or profession within the United States, shall deduct and withhold from such annual or periodic gains, profits, and income, regardless of amount or otherwise, and pay to the officer of the United States Government authorized to receive the same such sum as will be sufficient to pay the normal tax of 1 per cent imposed by law, an shall make an annual return on Form 1042
——————————————————————
… in … UNITED STATES, CITIZEN or RESIDENT ALIEN … having … control … of … INCOME of … NONRESIDENT ALIEN from … any TRADE or PROFESSION within the UNITED STATES, shall deduct and WITHHOLD … INCOME… and pay to the OFFICER of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT … to pay the … TAX …
——————————————————————
The normal tax shall be withheld at the source from income accrued to nonresident aliens from corporate obligations and shall be returned and paid to the Government by debtor corporations and withholding agents as in the case of citizens and resident aliens, but without benefit of the specific exemption designated in paragraph C of the law
——————————————————————
The … TAX … WITHHELD at the SOURCE from INCOME … to NONRESIDENT ALIENS … shall be … paid to the GOVERNMENT by … WITHHOLDING AGENTS as in the case of CITIZENS and RESIDENT ALIENS …
——————————————————————
Form 1008, revised, claiming the benefit of such deductions as may be applicable to income arising within the United States and for refund of excess tax withheld, as provided by paragraphs B and P of the income-tax laws, may be filed by nonresident aliens, their agents or representatives, with the debtor corporation, withholding agent, or collector of internal revenue for the district in which the withholding return is required to be made
——————————————————————
… INCOME … within the UNITED STATES and … refund of excess TAX WITHHELD as provided by … the INCOME-TAX LAWS may be filed by NONRESIDENT ALIENS … with the WITHHOLDING AGENT, or COLLECTOR of INTERNAL REVENUE for the DISTRICT in which the WITHHOLDING RETURN is required to be made
——————————————————————
That part of paragraph E of the law which provides that

“if such person * * * is absent from the United States, * * * the return and application may be made for him or her by the person required to withhold and pay the tax * * *” is held to be applicable to the return and application on Form 1008, revised, of nonresident aliens
——————————————————————
… the LAW … provides that

“if such PERSON * * * is absent from the UNITED STATES, * * * the RETURNmay be madeby the PERSON required to WITHHOLD and pay the TAXof NONRESIDENT ALIENS
——————————————————————
A fiduciary acting in the capacity of trustee, executor, or administrator, when there is only one beneficiary and that beneficiary a nonresident alien, shall render a return on Form 1040, revised; but when there are two or more beneficiaries, one or all of whom are nonresident aliens, the fiduciary shall render a return on Form 1041, revised, and a personal return on Form 1040, revised, for each nonresident alien beneficiary
——————————————————————
… a NONRESIDENT ALIEN, shall render a return on FORM 1040 …

… NONRESIDENT ALIENS, … shall render a personal return on FORM 1040 … for each NONRESIDENT ALIEN …
——————————————————————
The liability, under the provisions of the law, to render personal returns, on or before March 1 next succeeding the tax year, of annual
Treasury Decision (T. D. 2313) Income Tax page 55
55

net income accrued to them from sources within the United States during the preceding calendar year attaches to nonresident aliens as in the case of returns required from citizens and resident aliens
——————————————————————
The LIABILITY, under the provisions of the LAW, to render personal returns, … of … INCOME … from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES … attaches to NONRESIDENT ALIENS as in the case of returns required from CITIZENS and RESIDENT ALIENS
——————————————————————
Therefore, a return on Form 1040, revised, is required except in cases where the total tax liability has been or is to be satisfied at the source by withholding or has been or is to be satisfied by personal return on Form 1040, revised, rendered in their behalf
——————————————————————
… a return on FORM 1040, … is required except in cases where the total TAX LIABILITY … is satisfied at the source by WITHHOLDING … or is … satisfied by personal return on FORM 1040 …
——————————————————————
Returns should be rendered to the collector of internal revenue for the district in which a nonresident alien carries on his principal business within the United States or, in the absence of a principal business within the United States and in all cases of doubt, to the collector of internal revenue at Baltimore, Md., in whose district Washington is situated
——————————————————————
Returns should be rendered to the COLLECTOR of INTERNAL REVENUE for the DISTRICT in which a NONRESIDENT ALIEN carries on his principal BUSINESS WITHIN the UNITED STATES …
——————————————————————
Nonresident aliens are held to be subject to the liabilities and requirements of all administrative, special, and general provisions of law in relation to the assessment, remission, collection, and refund of the income tax imposed by the act of October 3, 1913, and collectors of internal revenue will make collection of the tax by distraint, garnishment, execution, or other appropriate process provided by law
——————————————————————
NONRESIDENT ALIENS are … subject to the LIABILITIES … of LAW in relation to … the INCOME TAX …
——————————————————————
. . .

This decision will be held effective as of January 1, 1916

W. H. Osborn,
Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Approved, March 30, 1916:
Byron R. Newton,
Acting Secretary of the Treasury
_________________________________________________
From Treasury Decision 2131 we know the UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS are:
——————————————————————
1. CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
2. FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
3. TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
4. EMPLOYEES of the UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
——————————————————————
5. RESIDENT ALIENS
——————————————————————
and we know there are the:
——————————————————————
6. SOCIAL SECURITY TAXPAYERS
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
7. ObamaCare TAXPAYERS
——————————————————————
Employers like to give you a United States Federal Government “Withholding Certificate” to fill out

Why would you fill out a W-4❓

Are you a United States Federal Government Taxpayer❓

What if an Employer LIES to you and tells you that they cannot hire you unless you fill out a “Withholding Certificate”❓

Based on what❓

If you tell an Employer you are not a “Taxpayer” required to fill out a “Withholding Certificate”

the Internal Revenue Service might tell your Employer to Withhold anyway

Based on what❓
Internal Revenue Service United States Federal Government Taxpayer
The Internal Revenue Service may Levy on you “allegedly” based on Internal Revenue Code Section
6331

Based on what❓
Internal Revenue Code section 6331 Levy Congress
E. CLAY SHAW, JR.
22ND DISTRICT, FLORIDA
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515-0922

January 24, 2005

Mr. Gary A. Fennell
Boca Raton, Florida 33431-5926

Dear Mr. Fennell:

Thank you for contacting me with a question regarding your troubles with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

While responding as best I can, please understand that I am not giving any legal advice

I would strongly advise you to seek counsel on this matter

U.S. Code, Title 26, Subtitle F, Chapter 64, Subchapter D Part II, Section 6331 (a) states:

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax

Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official

If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section

This particular provision does not appear to extend to private sector employees
——————————————————————
This particular provision DOES NOT APPEAR to EXTEND to PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEES
——————————————————————
If a form was given to an employer that omitted section (a), this form could be considered misleading
——————————————————————
If a form was given to an EMPLOYER that OMITTED section (a), this form could be considered MISLEADING
——————————————————————
I hope that this is helpful to you

Again you may wish to seek help from an attorney or tax professional

Sincerely

E. Clay Shaw, Jr.

Member of Congress

ECS:cd
_________________________________________________
Which class of “TAXPAYER” does this apply to❓
——————————————————————
(EMPLOYEES of the UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT)

any OFFICER, EMPLOYEE, or ELECTED OFFICIAL, of the UNITED STATES, the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA, or any AGENCY or INSTRUMENTALITY of the UNITED STATES or the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA
——————————————————————
NOTE: The U.S. Congress described in the LAW how

“LEVY MAY BE MADE”

Congress did NOT describe how

“LEVY MAY BE MADE”

on any PERSONS other than those specifically named
_________________________________________________
From Internal Revenue Code section 6331 we know the UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS are:

——————————————————————
1. CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
2. FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
3. TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
4. (EMPLOYEES of the UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT)

any OFFICER, EMPLOYEE, or ELECTED OFFICIAL, of the UNITED STATES, the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA, or any AGENCY or INSTRUMENTALITY of the UNITED STATES or the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA
——————————————————————
5. RESIDENT ALIENS
——————————————————————
and we know there are the:
——————————————————————
6. SOCIAL SECURITY TAXPAYERS
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
7. ObamaCare TAXPAYERS
_________________________________________________
This is exactly the kind of LIE the Internal Revenue Service has engaged in:
——————————————————————
If a form was given to an EMPLOYER that OMITTED section (a), this form could be considered MISLEADING
——————————————————————
The Internal Revenue Service has also engaged in sending a letter that indicates they have not received a response from you, even though you have a Certified Mail Receipt from the United States Postal Service, showing that they did receive your response

The Internal Revenue Service has also told an “alleged Taxpayer” that they want to meet and go over your books and records, and when the “alleged Taxpayer” agrees to the meeting and replies that as allowed in the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, they will bring a recorder to record the meeting, and then on the day of the meeting when the “alleged Taxpayer” shows up at the I.R.S. Office for the meeting, the IRS will call off the meeting

These are some of the tactics the IRS liars have used
——————————————————————
SOCIAL SECURITY straight from the COURT’s MOUTH
——————————————————————
What is

● U.S. citizenship

and who is a

● U.S. citizen ?
—————————————————————
Are you a

● U.S. citizen

or a

● citizen of the United States

(a citizen of one of the several States,

the States of the Union,

the United States of America) ?
image
The Social Security Administration

seems to think that a 12-year-old

knows the difference between a

● U.S. citizen

and

● a citizen of the United States
image● United States citizen defined
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/2014/08/30/united-states-citizen/
—————————————————————
● citizen of the United States defined
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/citizen-of-the-united-states/
image
A

● U.S. citizen

is a

Federalcitizen
——————————————————————
Those born in the District of Columbia, federal territories (e.g. Puerto Rico Guam etc.), and federal enclaves (e.g. American Indian reservations military bases etc.)
——————————————————————
After the Emancipation Proclamation; by Abraham Lincoln and the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, it was necessary since those who were Emancipated were NOT considered to be “citizens

They were considered to be “property” before the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
—————————————————————–
AMENDMENT XIV

Passed by Congress

June 13, 1866

Ratified July 9, 1868

Section 1.

All persons

born

or

naturalized

in the United States,

and

subject to the jurisdiction thereof,

are citizens of the United States

and

of the State wherein they reside

No State shall

make

or

enforce

any law which shall abridge the

privileges

or

immunities

of citizens of the United States;

nor shall any State deprive

any person

of

life,

liberty,

or

property,

without due process of law;

nor deny to

any person

within its jurisdiction

the equal protection of the laws
image● a citizen of the United States

is one who was born in one of

the several States

(the States of the Union

the United States of America)

and were therefor,

● a citizen of a State

as well as

● a citizen of the United States
image
Does a

● U.S. citizen

have “rights❓
………………………………………………..
● a citizen of the United States

has

rights

enumerated in the

Bill of Rights

and the

Constitution
imageimageimageimageimageimageimage
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html
——————————————————————
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution
_____________________________________________
What is a

Social Security Number

used for ?
—————————————————————–
It’s used by the

● Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

as a

● Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)
_____________________________________________
What was the

Social Security Act

for ?
imageAN ACT

to provide for the

general welfare

by

establishing a system

of

Federal old-age benefits,

and by

● enabling the several States
_____________________________________________
the SEVERAL STATES
image
Who did the

Social Security Act

apply to ?
—————————————————————–
The Social Security Act,

Pub.L. 74–271,

49 Stat. 620,

enacted August 14, 1935,

now codified as

42 U.S.C. ch. 7
—————————————————————–
WHY IS A

U.S. CITIZEN

INCLUDED

IN THE DEFINITION OF

CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES

AT

33 UNITED STATES CODE

but NOT

42 U.S.C. Chapter 7 ?
_____________________________________________
U.S. Code › Title 33 › Chapter 29 › § 1502
—————————————————————
TITLE 33 – NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
——————————————————————
33 U.S. Code § 1502 – Definitions
_____________________________________________
Are you a

US citizen

or

citizen of the United States ?
imageTITLE XI- GENERAL PROVISIONS

DEFINITIONS SECTION 1101. (a) When used in this Act-

(1) The term

State

(except when used in section 531)

INCLUDES

Alaska,

Hawaii,

and

the District of Columbia
—————————————————————–
What is the

Legal definition

of the term

includes?
—————————————————————–
The legal definition of the term

INCLUDE

is:
——————————————————————
INCLUDE(S) (verb)

absorb,

adscribere,

be composed of,

be formed of,

be made up of,

begird,

boast,

bound,

bracket,

circumscribe,

classify,

close in,

combine,

compass,

comprehend,

comprehendere,

consist of,

contain,

cover,

embody,

embrace,

encircle,

engird,

envelop,

girdle,

hold,

incorporate,

involve,

merge,

put a barrier around,

span,

subsume,

surround,

take in,

unify,

unite

The less is always included in the greater
——————————————————————
THE LESS is ALWAYS INCLUDED IN the GREATER
——————————————————————
The inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of another
——————————————————————
THE INCLUSION of ONE THING IS the EXCLUSION of ANOTHER
——————————————————————
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx?rd=1&word=include
——————————————————————
This MEANS that the term

INCLUDES

ONLY “includes” the terms that come AFTER the term

INCLUDES
_____________________________________________
Includes defined
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/includes/
_____________________________________________
What is the

Legal definition

of the term

State?
_____________________________________________
State(s) defined
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/states/
_____________________________________________
This

MEANS

that the

definition

would be read as:
—————————————————————–
(1) The term

State

(except when used in section 531)

MEANS

areas under Federal legislative jurisdiction,

Alaska,

Hawaii,

and

the District of Columbia
imageTITLE XI- GENERAL PROVISIONS

DEFINITIONS SECTION 1101. (a) When used in this Act-

(2) The term

United States

when used in a geographical sense

MEANS

the States,

Alaska,

Hawaii,

and

the District of Columbia

(At the time,

Alaska

and

Hawaii

were

NOT

part of

the “several States”)
—————————————————————–
What is the

Legal definition

of the term

United States?
_____________________________________________
United States defined
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/united-states/
_____________________________________________
This

MEANS

that the

definition

would be read as:
—————————————————————–
(2) The term

United States

when used in a geographical sense

MEANS

areas under Federal legislative jurisdiction,

Alaska,

Hawaii,

and

the District of Columbia
image
The

Federal United States

has the power to legislate for

areas

as mentioned above

(its jurisdiction),

just as any of

the several States

has the power to legislate re

persons,

places,

and

things

within the jurisdiction of the State
_________________________________________________
if you are

a citizen of the United States

residing

in one of

the several States,

you are considered as a

non-resident alien

as concerns the

other 49 States of the Union

The same applies to the

Federal United States

If you are

a citizen of the United States

residing

in one of

the several States

you are considered as a

non-resident alien

as concerns the

Federal United States

Of course, if you

voluntarily

sign up for

Social Security,

the

United States Federal Government

is going to take it as meaning that you want to be treated as a

(Federal) United States citizen

instead of

a citizen of the United States

(a citizen of one of the several States)
_____________________________________________
Where does the

Social Security (FICA) Taxes

go ?
_________________________________________________
Helvering v. Davis,

301 U.S. 619

(1937),

“The proceeds of both

[employee and employer]

taxes

are to be paid into the

Treasury

like

internal-revenue taxes

generally, and are

not earmarked in any way

That is, the

Social Security Tax

was

constitutional

as a mere exercise of

Congress‘s general taxation powers
—————————————————————
8. Title II of the

Social Security Act

provides for

Federal OldAge Benefits
image
It creates an

OldAge Reserve Account

in the

Treasury

and authorizes future appropriations to provide for the required old-age payments,

but,

in itself,

neither appropriates money

nor brings any money into the Treasury
image
The proceeds of both

taxes

are to be paid into the

Treasury

like

internal revenue taxes

generally, and

are not earmarked in any way
imageimage
The first section of this title creates an

account

in the

United States Treasury

to be known as the

OldAge

Page 301 U. S. 636

Reserve Account

§ 201

No present appropriation, however, is made to that account
image
The argument for petitioners is that the

tax moneys

are not earmarked,

and that

Congress

is at liberty to spend them as it will
imageSOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) TAXES DID NOT GO INTO A TRUST FUND FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

THEY WENT PAID INTO THE TREASURY LIKE INTERNAL-REVENUE TAXES AND WERE NOT EARMARKED IN ANY WAY FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

SO THEY COULD BE USED BY THE U.S. CONGRESS FOR ANY PURPOSE, INCLUDING HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH SOCIAL SECURITY
—————————————————————
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/301/619/case.html
—————————————————————
http://www.law.cornell.edu/socsec/course/readings/301us619.htm
_____________________________________________
Did you fill out a

Social Security Application

in the past because:

1. YOU WERE TOLD TO, or

2. YOU WERE TOLD YOU HAD TO, or

3. YOU THOUGHT YOU HAD TO, or

4. YOU WERE TOLD YOU COULD NOT BE HIRED WITHOUT a SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ?

DID YOU CONSULT with an ATTORNEY / LAWYER BEFORE YOU DID ?
_____________________________________________
WHY DOES THE FORM NOT DEFINE

U.S. citizen?
_____________________________________________
Did you know what was going to happen if you provided the

Social Security Number

to:

1. An employer, or

2. A bank, or

3. Others ?

Did you know that if you provided the

Social Security Number

to an employer, that

1. Social Security Taxes (FICA)

would be withheld from your pay ?

2. Medicare Taxes

would be withheld from your pay ?

3. Federal Income Taxes

would be withheld from your pay ?

If you did

NOT

know all of the above, the

Supreme Court of the United States

(SCOTUS)

said:
imageBrady v. U.S.

397 U.S. 742, at page 748

(1970)

Waivers of constitutional rights,

not only must be voluntary

but they must be knowing,

intelligent acts

done with sufficient awareness

of the relevant circumstances

and likely consequences
image
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=397&invol=742
——————————————————————
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/742/
image
Why does the

United States Government

want parents to obtain a

Social Security Number (SSN)

for their kids ?
_____________________________________________
Please contact a competent attorney / lawyer for a legal opinion if you do not know
imageSocial Security
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/2014/08/27/social-security/
_____________________________________________

—————————————————————–
http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=68.
_____________________________________________

—————————————————————–
http://www.legisworks.org/congress/74/publaw-271.pdf
_____________________________________________
Social Security Act Title I
P.L. 74-271
, approved August 14, 1935, 49 Stat. 620

SOCIAL SECURITY ACT

(As Amended Through January 1, 2013)
—————————————————————–
http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title00/0000.htm
_____________________________________________
Constitutional Background
to the Social Security Act of 1935

by Eduard A. Lopez
—————————————————————–
http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v50n1/v50n1p5.pdf
_____________________________________________
SOCIAL SECURITY ACT [P.L. 74–271, approved August 14, 1935, 49 Stat. 620.]
—————————————————————–
http://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/SSA_CMD.pdf
_____________________________________________
Articles
—————————————————————–
http://wikipediaint.wordpress.com/about/image

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s