Police State IOWA (U.S.A.)

LESSON: Maybe the Ankeny Police Department does not know what “JURISDICTION” is, because when they entered the City Limits of Des Moines, Iowa, to carry out their SWAT raid, they entered the Police JURISDICTION of the City of Des Moines, Iowa, which is like you going over to your neighbor’s and planting your flag in their yard. Maybe the Ankeny Police Department will start doing SWAT raids across the border in Missouri

SARCASM … deal with it
_______________________________________________
RAID FILMED: Ankeny Police ‘Traumatize’ Family
POSTED 9:51 PM, FEBRUARY 3, 2014, BY AARON BRILBECK, UPDATED AT 05:26PM, FEBRUARY 4, 2014
………………………………………………..
RAID FILMED: Ankeny Police ‘Traumatize’ Family | whotv.com
Feb 3, 2014 – STORY UPDATE: Aaron Brilbeck spoke with Ankeny Police about the raid Tuesday, see the response
——————————————————————
RAID FILMED: Ankeny Police ‘Traumatize’ Family
_______________________________________________
NEW DETAILS: Ankeny Police Responds After Raid | whotv.com
Posted 9:48 pm, February 4, 2014, by Aaron Brilbeck, Updated at 10:39am
STORY UPDATE: Police have decided to hold a news
If one of their cops had been shot during this raid
February 5, 2014 at 3:05 am
I come from cop family
——————————————————————
NEW DETAILS: Ankeny Police Responds After Raid
………………………………………………..
HOME RAID: Watch Ankeny Police’s News Conference
_______________________________________________
RAID: Victim Is Former Ankeny Officer

Posted 9:57 pm, February 6, 2014, by Aaron Brilbeck, Updated at 10:55pm, February 6, 2014
——————————————————————
FRAUD RAID: Victim Is Former Ankeny Officer
_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Scenes from a militarized America: Iowa family ‘terrorized’
………………………………………………..
The Washington Post
@WashingtonPost
Radley Balko
@Radley Balko
2/4/2014 February 4, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2014/02/04/scenes-from-a-militarized-america-iowa-family-terrorized/
_______________________________________________

UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS: Who are They ❓— 1. CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD, 2. FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES, 3. TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS, and 4. EMPLOYEES of the UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

The Administrative Procedures Act (APA) requires that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) publish its organization and functions in the Federal Register

The I.R.S. decided it didn’t need to continue obeying the law, and stopped publishing this information in the Federal Register, saying that the information was widely available to the public at I R S offices, law libraries, and elsewhere

If you are one of those people who were suckered into getting a Social Security Number; because you did not know that a religious exemption was available, and you did not consult an attorney / lawyer about your legal rights, and have Social Security “tax” withheld from your remuneration, you are a SOCIAL SECURITY TAXPAYER, but where does it say that just because you participate in the Social Security “scheme,” that that also makes you “liable” for the United States Government Federal Income Tax❓

OBAMAcare is also a TAX

Isn’t it great that the Internal Revenue Service knows the different “classes” of TAXPAYERS❓

This means that if the I.R.S. thinks that you are a “TAXPAYER,” they should be able to tell you which “class” of “TAXPAYERS” you are in

Which “TAXPAYER” are you❓
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
698

Statement of Organization and Functions

1

1 36 F.R. 849

(F.R. = Federal Register)

This material supersedes the statement on organization and functions published at 35 F.R. 2417-2456 and 35 F.R. 13532 [C.B. 1970-1, 442 and C.B. 1970-2, 513]

(C.B. = Internal Revenue Service [I.R.S.] Cumulative Bulletin)

Dated: January 11, 1971

1100 Organization and Staffing

1110 ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
714

1113.56 Office of International Operations—Director of International Operations

The Office of International Operations administers the Internal Revenue laws and related statutes (except those relating to alcohol, tobacco, narcotics and firearms) as they relate to

citizen taxpayers residing or doing business abroad,
——————————————————————
CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
foreign taxpayers deriving income from sources within the United States,
——————————————————————
FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
taxpayers who are required to withhold tax on income flowing abroad to nonresident aliens and foreign corporations
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
442

Statement of Organization and Functions

1

1 35 F.R. 2417

This material supersedes the statement on organization and functions published at 34 F.R. 1657-1695 [C.B. 1969-1, 403]
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
456

1113.56 OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS—DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

The Office of International Operations administers the Internal Revenue laws and related statutes (except those relating to alcohol, tobacco, narcotics, and firearms) as they relate to

citizen taxpayers residing or doing business abroad,
——————————————————————
CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
foreign taxpayers deriving income from sources within the United States,
——————————————————————
FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
taxpayers who are required to withhold tax on income flowing abroad to nonresident aliens and foreign corporations
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
403

Statement of Organization and Functions

1

1 34 F.R. 1657

Organization and functions

This material supersedes the statement on organization and functions published at 32 F.R. 727-762 [C.B. 1967-1, 435]

Dated: January 23, 1969
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
413

1113.56 Office of International Operations—Director of International Operations

The Office of International Operations administers the Internal Revenue laws and related statutes (except those relating to alcohol, tobacco, narcotics, and firearms) as they relate to

citizen taxpayers residing or doing business abroad,
——————————————————————
CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
foreign taxpayers deriving income from sources within the United States
——————————————————————
FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
taxpayers who are required to withhold tax on income flowing abroad to nonresident aliens and foreign corporations
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
435

STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS

1

1 32 F.R. 727

ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS

This material supersedes the statement on organization published at 30 F.R. 9368-9402 [C.B. 1965-2, 863]
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
460

1113.56 OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS.—DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS.—The Office of International Operations administers the Internal Revenue laws and related statutes (except those relating to alcohol, tobacco, narcotics, and firearms) as they relate to

citizen taxpayers residing or doing business abroad,
——————————————————————
CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
foreign taxpayers deriving income from sources within the United States,
——————————————————————
FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
taxpayers who are required to withhold tax on income flowing abroad to nonresident aliens and foreign corporations
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
863

STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS

1

1 30 F.R. 9368

This material supersedes the statement on organization and functions published at 26 F.R. 6372-6395 [C.B. 1961-2, 483] as amended by 26 F.R. 8494, 11219, and 11220

2

2 Reflected in the Statement of Organization and Functions in C.B. 1961-2, 483, at p. 542
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
888

1113.56 OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS—DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

The mission of the Office of International Operations is to encourage and achieve the highest possible degree of voluntary compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and related statutes on the part of
——————————————————————
VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE
——————————————————————
citizen taxpayers residing or doing business abroad,
——————————————————————
CITIZEN TAXPAYERS RESIDING or DOING BUSINESS ABROAD
——————————————————————
foreign taxpayers deriving income from sources within the United States,
——————————————————————
FOREIGN TAXPAYERS DERIVING INCOME from SOURCES WITHIN the UNITED STATES
——————————————————————
and
——————————————————————
TAXPAYERS who are REQUIRED to WITHHOLD TAX on INCOME FLOWING ABROAD to NONRESIDENT ALIENS and FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
——————————————————————
taxpayers who are required to withhold tax on certain payments to nonresident aliens and foreign corporations
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
PART V

ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS

1

1 26 F. R. 6372

This material supersedes the statement on organization published at 21 F.R. 10418-10432 [C.B. 1957-1, 679], as amended by 22 F.R. 245,

2

22 F.R. 643,

2

22 F.R. 1967,

2

22 F.R. 4873,

2

22 F.R. 6434

2

23 F.R. 3070 [C.B. 1958-2, 663], and 25 F.R. 1698 [C.B. 1960-1, 855]

2 Reflected in the Statement of Organization and Functions as published in C.B. 1957-1, 679

(483)
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
505

1113.67 Office of International Operations.—Director of International Operations.—Has primary responsibility for the administration of the Internal Revenue laws

in all areas of the world,

outside the United States;

and coordinates for the Service all foreign investigations and requests for information from foreign countries or U.S. possessions

Acts as Competent Authority for all operating provisions of tax treaties under delegation from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
PART V

ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS

1

1 21 F. R. 10418

This material supersedes the statement on organization published at 11 F. R. 177A-22 as Part 600, Subparts A and B; Commissioner’s Reorganization Order No. 15, except for paragraph 6 (18 F. R. 4033) [C. B. 1953-2, 505]; and Commissioner’s Reorganization Order No. 16 (18 F. R. 4033)

2

2 Not published in Bulletin

(679)
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)
694

1113.56 International Operations Division.—The International Operations Division administers the internal revenue laws (except those relating to alcohol, tobacco and firearms)

in all areas of the world

outside the continental United States

except Alaska and the Territory of Hawaii

This includes the initiation and development of policies and programs designed to establish and maintain satisfactory levels of

voluntary tax compliance
——————————————————————
VOLUNTARY TAX COMPLIANCE
——————————————————————
among
——————————————————————
UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS ABROAD
——————————————————————
United States taxpayers abroad
Internal Revenue Service Statement of Organization and Functions (I.R.S.)

President Obama (October 2010) complained about individuals who “hide behind those front groups,” called such groups a “threat to our democracy,” and claimed such groups were engaged in “unsupervised” spending

President Obama
139.
October 2010
complained about individuals who “hide behind those front groups,” called such groups a “threat to our democracy,” and claimed such groups were engaged in “unsupervised” spending
_______________________________________________
[PDF] pr 7% – Center for Competitive Politics
20 feb. 2014 – The following month, President Obama began the process
The next week the President complained about individuals who “
hide behind those front groups,’ called such groups
——————————————————————
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2014-02-20_American-Center-For-Law-And-Justice_IRS_Comments-On-Proposed-501c4-Rulemaking.pdf
Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice
ACLJ

American Center for Law and Justice

February 20, 2014

Mr. John Koskinen
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
CC: LPD: PR (REG 134417-13), Room 5205
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station
Washington DC 20044

RE: Comments on IRS NPRM, REG-134417

Dear Mr. Koskinen:

The American Center for Law and Justice (“ACLJ”) respectfully submits these comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS” or “Service”) on November 29, 2013

As set forth in the NPRM, REG-134417 “contains proposed regulations that provide guidance to tax-exempt social welfare organizations on political activities related to candidates that will not be considered to promote social welfare,” Guidance for Tax-Exempt Social Welfare Organizations on Candidate Related Political Activities, Internal Revenue Service, REG-134417-13, 78 Fed. Reg. 71535

The timing of the NPRM is troubling given the backdrop against which it has been issued

Currently, the IRS is being investigated by Congress and the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a result of abuses by employees and officials of the Service with regard to tax exemption applications filed under Sections 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) by conservative organizations

In a pending lawsuit, ACLJ represents 41 such conservative, grassroots organizations whose applications for tax-exempt determinations were improperly and unconstitutionally handled based upon their political viewpoints

The gravamen of this lawsuit is that the IRS and its employees deprived the Plaintiffs of their rights to freedom of speech and association under the First Amendment and the equal protection of the laws under the Fifth Amendment

See Linchpins for Liberty, et al. v. United States of American (sic America), United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-0777-RBW

When the NPRM was issued, the ink was barely dry on the Treasury Inspector General’s Report which first identified the IRS abuses against ACLJ’s clients and other organizations — abuses that had been suspected yet repeatedly denied by IRS officials in Congressional testimony

201 Maryland Avenue, N E
Washington DC 20002
Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice
John Koskinen
February 20, 2014
Page 2

and elsewhere

Yet, without any apparent chagrin, the IRS re-entered the arena with the issuance of the NPRM in an attempt to further censor political speech and restrict freedom of association or amount of a social welfare organization’s political
1

1 The NPRM was issued over the Thanksgiving Recess and further suspect in and of itself

Indeed, the proposed regulations appear to be an attempt to double down on the improper actions of the IRS with respect to the rights of conservative, grass roots organizations to engage in free speech and free association

ACLJ opposes the proposed regulations in their entirety

In addition to the widespread perception that these regulations are being proposed for political reasons, the administration’s efforts to enact these changes should cease for at least three other reasons

First, the proposed regulations go beyond statutory authority

The Service states that these proposed regulations are necessary to address “the lack of a clear and concise definition of political campaign intervention”

78 Fed. Reg. 71536

(quoting Internal Revenue Service,

“Charting a Path Forward at the IRS:

Initial Assessment and Plan of Action”

at 20 (June 24, 2013)

(hereinafter “Charting a Path Forward”)

The Service further claims that

“‘[t]he distinction between campaign intervention and social welfare activity, and the measurement of the organization’s social welfare activities relative to its total activities, have created considerable confusion for both the public and the IRS in making appropriate section 501(c)(4) determinations
2

2 It is interesting to note that this purported confusion seemed not to have existed prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), which is discussed herein

78 Fed. Reg. 71536

(quoting Charting a Path Forward at 28)

If there are difficulties that the Service has in applying its regulations concerning 510(c)(4) organizations, these are problems of the Service’s own making because there is no authority under section 501(c)(4) that would allow the Service to evaluate the type or amount of a social welfare organization’s political activity in the first place

Thus, without Congressional authorization the Service has essentially imposed requirements upon organizations seeking 501(c)(4) exempt status, or operating pursuant to that status, that Congress has not authorized, and now the Service complains that those unlawful requirements have become difficult to administer and that, therefore, even more stringent requirements must be implemented

ACLJ submits that the Service lacks any statutory authority for the regulations as they currently exist

The proposed regulations which would even further restrict political activities should therefore be withdrawn and re-proposed without any such restrictions

Second, if the proposed regulations are implemented they will (sic – be) no doubt be challenged and are likely to be stricken as unconstitutional under the First Amendment

ACLJ submits that the Service, as a steward of the public fisc, should pause before engaging in agency action that fails so obviously to meet constitutional requirements

Third, there is no reason for the Service to further entangle itself in making political determinations given the fact that the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) already has in place an extensive regulatory framework to make these evaluations and a body of law already exists to interpret that framework

Thus, the Service should heed the advice of its own National Taxpayer Advocate and defer to the FEC on matters of political activity
Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice

Jay Sekulow ACLJ American Center for Law and Justice
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

NORTH CAROLINA: Why does @POTUS @BarackObama, Jack Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury (@USTreasury), the United States Congress (@USCongress): United States House of Representatives (@USHouseRep) Judiciary Committee (@HouseJudiciary), United States Senate (@USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate (#USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on The Constitution, U. S. Senate (USSenate) Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, U.S. Congress (#USCongress): U.S. House of Representatives (#USHouseRep) and Senate (#Senate), Joint Committee on Taxation (@jctgov), allow Internal Revenue Service (#IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen, to Misstate on the I.R.S. web-site, the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States (@SCOTUS) Sixteenth Amendment United States Federal Income Tax Decisions delivered by Mr. Chief Justice White in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rail Road Company, 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided January 24, 1916), and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U.S. 103, 36 S.Ct. 278, 60 L.Ed. 546, No. 359 (Argued October 14 and 15, 1915, Decided February 21, 1916), for 34 years (1981-2015): the “sixteenth amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United States citizens throughout the nation, not just in federal enclaves,” in Direct Contradiction to: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – HOUSE March 27, 1943. pages 2579-2581, and The CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE Report No. 84-168A, 784 / 275 “Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the Federal Income Tax Laws,” dated May 25, 1979, Updated September 26, 1984, HJ 4625: the Sixteenth Amendment…sought to restrain the Court from viewing an income tax as a direct tax…did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution,…Direct taxes were,…still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect [excise] (“income”) taxes were still the subject of the rule of uniformity”? Are they all Corrupt, Inept, Gutless Cowards, or Political Hacks❓

North Carolina
Why’s #US #Congress let #IRS LIE re #SCOTUS 16th Amendment Federal #Income #Tax Unanimous decisions❓
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-st
_________________________________________________
NORTH CAROLINA
_________________________________________________
G. K. Butterfield
George Kenneth Butterfield
@GKButterfield
North Carolina, 1st District
https://butterfield.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Renee Ellmers (R)
@RepReneeEllmers
North Carolina, 2nd District
https://ellmers.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Walter B. Jones (R)
Walter Beaman Jones
@RepWalterJones
North Carolina, 3rd District
https://jones.house.gov

_________________________________________________
David Price
David E. Price
@RepDavidEPrice
North Carolina, 4th District
https://price.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Virginia Foxx (R)
@VirginiaFoxx
@RepVirginiaFoxx
North Carolina, 5th District
https://foxx.house.gov

_________________________________________________
OVERSIGHT and GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE
Mark Walker R-North Carolina, 6th District
@RepMarkWalker
https://walker.house.gov

_________________________________________________
David Rouzer
@DavidRouzer
North Carolina, 7th District
https://rouzer.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Richard Hudson
@RepRichHudson
North Carolina, 8th District
https://hudson.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Robert Pittenger
@RepPittenger
North Carolina, 9th District
https://pittenger.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Patrick T. McHenry (R)
@PatrickMcHenry
North Carolina, 10th District
https://mchenry.house.gov

_________________________________________________
OVERSIGHT and GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE
Mark Meadows R-North Carolina 11th District
@RepMarkMeadows
https://meadows.house.gov

_________________________________________________
Alma Adams (D)
Alma S. Adams
@RepAdams
North Carolina, 12th District
https://adams.house.gov

_________________________________________________
George Holding (R)
@RepHolding
North Carolina, 13th District
https://holding.house.gov

_________________________________________________
United States Constitution

First Amendment

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE

peaceably to assemble,

and

TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
——————————————————————
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
………………………………………………..
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html
======================================
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
TEL: (202) 224-3121
TTY: (202) 225-1904
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

President Obama (October 14, 2010) called organizations with “benign sounding” names “a problem for democracy”

President Obama
139.
October 14, 2010
called organizations with “benign sounding” names “a problem for democracy”:
_______________________________________________
The IRS Assault on Dissenting Speech | American Center for Law and Justice
7 feb. 2014 – On
October 14, 2010, President
Obama called organizations with “
benign-sounding” names “a problem for democracy”
——————————————————————
http://aclj.org/free-speech-2/the-irs-assault-of-dissenting-speech
_______________________________________________
Obama Calls Americans for Prosperity a ‘Problem for Democracy
14 oct. 2010 – Oct. 14, 2010
8:59pm Meredith Jessup
I think that is a problem for democracy,” he concluded
And the groups are
benign-sounding: Americans for Prosperity
——————————————————————
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2010/10/14/obama-calls-americans-for-prosperity-a-problem-for-democracy-again/
======================================
Linchpins of Liberty v. United States
Case 1:13-cv-00777
October 18, 2013
——————————————————————
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/second-amended-complaint-filed-redacted.pdf
======================================
I.R.S. ʟ I a R S
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-v1
——————————————————————
UNDEMOCRATIC
How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom
======================================
Why is the Internal Revenue Service Corrupt❓
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/p5tuFO-sT
======================================
BACKASSARD ALABAMA BLOG ARTICLES
——————————————————————
http://wp.me/P5tuFO-1
======================================

Police State NEW YORK (U.S.A.) Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) New York Values (#NewYorkValues)

They Hate Us for Our Freedom
Donald Trump’s Police State – The New York Times
………………………………………………..
27 nov. 2015
He’s building his police state on the fly
But in just a few days he went from saying he would
——————————————————————
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/09/opinion/100000003889944.embedded.html
image
Bills introduce gameday

“See Something Say Something”

app
………………………………………………..
Buffalo Bills
@BuffaloBills
Anna Stolzenburg
@AnnaStolz
9/9/2014 September 9, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.buffalobills.com/news/article=1/Bills-introduce-gameday-See-Something-Say-Something-app/3f79d7b7-fd26-4815-b46b-af6d57ee48ff
New York
Muslim lawyer sues NYPD after arrest for

‘blocking the sidewalk’

during pro-Palestinian rally
………………………………………………..
RT
@RT_com (@RT_America)
9/6/2014 September 6, 2014
——————————————————————
http://rt.com/usa/185596-lawyer-sues-nypd-muslim/
New York
NYC cops arrest human rights lawyer waiting outside restaurant while her kids used restroom
………………………………………………..
Raw Story
@RawStory
Scott Kaufman
9/4/2014 September 4, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/04/nyc-cops-arrest-human-rights-lawyer-waiting-outside-restaurant-while-her-kids-used-restroom/?onswipe_redirect=no&oswrr=1
STOP Say No to a Police State
Eric Garner

The Mayor, the Cops and the Chorus of Outrage
………………………………………………..
The New York Times
@NYTimes
Lawrence Downes
@LawrenceDownes
8/17/2014 August 17, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/opinion/the-mayor-the-police-and-eric-garner.html?_r=0
New York
Only a fraction of

‘arrest resisters’

are prosecuted
………………………………………………..
NY Post
@NYPost
Philip Messing
@PhilipMessing
Kirstan Conley
Daniel Prendergast
@DanielPren
8/15/2014 August 15, 2014
——————————————————————
http://nypost.com/2014/08/15/too-few-resisting-arrest-suspects-are-prosecuted-nypd-official/
New York
De Blasio Tells NYers:

‘Don’t resist arrest’
………………………………………………..
NY Post
@NYPost
Yoav Goen
Amber Jamieson
@AmbieJ
8/13/2014 August 13, 2014
——————————————————————
http://nypost.com/2014/08/13/de-blasio-tells-new-yorkers-dont-resist-arrest/
New York
Family pet shot in the head by plainclothes cops searching at wrong address
………………………………………………..
Police State USA
@PoliceStateUSA_
8/6/2014 August 6, 2014
——————————————————————

Family pet shot in the head by plainclothes cops searching at wrong address

Police State
Mom arrested after 7-year-old boy left alone at Lego Store
………………………………………………..
PIX11
@PIX11News (@PIX11)
Christopher Brito
8/6/2014 August 6, 2014
——————————————————————
Mom arrested after 7-year-old boy left alone at Lego Store
STOP Say No to a Police State
Naked Brooklyn woman dragged from apartment, left topless in hallway for minutes by NYPD officers who say she beat 12-year-old daughter
………………………………………………..
NY Daily News
@NYDailyNews
John Marzulli
@MarzulliJ
Laura Dimon
@LauraDimon
Ginger Adams Otis
@GingerOtis
8/1/2014 August 1, 2014
——————————————————————
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/nypd-officers-drag-naked-brooklyn-woman-apartment-video-article-1.1889292#ixzz39GJD54uj
They Hate Us for Our Freedom
Police Shoot Bystanders in New York, Kill Unarmed Man in North Carolina
………………………………………………..
Slate
@Slate
Daniel Politi
@DPoliti
9/15/2013 September 15, 2013
——————————————————————
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/09/15/police_shoot_bystanders_in_new_york_kill_unarmed_man_in_north_carolina.html
_______________________________________________
Times Square shooting:

NYPD officers shoot two innocent bystanders near Times Square
………………………………………………..
CBS News
@CBSNews
9/15/2013 September 15, 2013
——————————————————————
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57602998/times-square-shooting-nypd-officers-shoot-two-innocent-bystanders-near-times-square/
_______________________________________________
militarized police working in conjunction with federal agencies

The C.I.A. and the N.Y.P.D.
………………………………………………..
The New York Times
@NYTimes
7/5/2013 July 5, 2013
——————————————————————
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/06/opinion/the-cia-and-the-nypd.html?_r=0
_______________________________________________
Dear New York City:

Stop Being a Police State and Let Us Drink Beer in Parks
………………………………………………..
9 august 2012
I roll my eyes every time someone says that New York is the greatest place on earth
The inhabitants
——————————————————————
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/nyc-parks-alcohol_b_1748259.html
_______________________________________________
New York City:

Prototype of the American Police State ?
………………………………………………..
12 March 2012
“I have my own army in the NYPD, which is the seventh biggest army in the world”
I have my own State
——————————————————————
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/new_york_city_prototype_of_the_american_police_state
_______________________________________________
Bloomberg:

‘I have my own army’
………………………………………………..
RT
@RT com
11/30/2011 November 30, 2011
——————————————————————
http://rt.com/usa/bloomberg-nypd-army-york-599/
_______________________________________________
Occupy Wall Street protesters beaten, maced by police
………………………………………………..
The Washington Post
@WashingtonPost
Elizabeth Flock
@LizFlock
10/6/2011 October 6, 2011
——————————————————————
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/post/occupy-wall-street-protesters-get-beaten-maced-by-police-videos/2011/10/06/gIQAVdA3PL_blog.html
_______________________________________________
Girl’s arrest for doodling raises concerns about zero tolerance
………………………………………………..
CNN
@CNN
Stephanie Chen
@StephKChen
2/18/2010 February 18, 2010
——————————————————————
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/18/new.york.doodle.arrest/
======================================